Recently, I spent time delving into a project focused on AI×Blockchain infrastructure, and I feel that the market has not fully recognized its potential.



There are voices everywhere in the industry calling for more powerful models, but this project targets a different level—when AI systems truly participate in on-chain interactions and real-world decision-making, how can we ensure that their reasoning processes are trustworthy, verifiable, and auditable?

This question may sound a bit niche, but it's quite straightforward: if AI black-box decisions directly affect the flow of assets on the chain, why should users trust them? This is the real bottleneck for AI to land in Web3. Compared to optimizing algorithms themselves, solving trust issues is actually more scarce and valuable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 18h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. Black box decision-making directly controlling assets is indeed a nightmare. Trust issues have been seriously underestimated, but honestly, this track is very challenging, and it might not seem so sexy in the short term. Right now, everyone is hyping up huge models, and no one wants to put effort into validation layers... That's why real opportunities are always in uncharted territory.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 18h ago
That's a reasonable point; the black box problem is indeed a pitfall. This is the real bottleneck area—no one is really tackling trusted computing properly. Stacking models has long lost its novelty; the verification layer is the real gold mine. It sounds like a high barrier to entry, but that also means fewer competitors. Deep and well-written article; this perspective is indeed easy to overlook.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 18h ago
Ah, I see. That's the real issue—being stronger isn't always better. NGL, verifiable AI decision-making has indeed been underestimated. Who would dare to use on-chain assets with a black-box operation? Stacking models in that way has long been outdated; we still need to start from the trust layer.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapistvip
· 18h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. Trustworthiness has been seriously overlooked. Anyone can do the algorithm tricks, but those who dare to bite the trust bone are the real players. Using on-chain assets as collateral for black-box decision-making—how risky is that... This is the direction I've always wanted to see, not just for show. Honestly, the market now loves to boast about big parameters and fast speeds, but no one cares about what AI is really thinking—ridiculous. Verifiable and auditable—sounds just right. This is what Web3 should look like.
View OriginalReply0
staking_grampsvip
· 18h ago
That's right, this perspective has indeed been underestimated. This is the real issue that needs to be addressed, not just competing models. Once trustworthiness is broken, even the strongest AI is useless. Agreed, on-chain black-box operations are basically a ticking time bomb. This guy sees through it; the market is still hyping concepts. The logic may be rough, but verification and auditing are the moat.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)