2026-01-11 22:24:00

Dusk Network's Hedger solution indeed has a unique approach to balancing privacy and compliance. By combining zero-knowledge proofs with homomorphic encryption, the transaction process can be fully audited to meet financial regulatory requirements while also protecting user privacy. This is a significant attraction for institutional-level applications.

The ecosystem-driven token DWK's incentive mechanism is also gradually unfolding. The testnet has already attracted over 20,000 nodes, indicating that the project's efforts in community building are quite substantial. Projects that can achieve both privacy and compliance are few in number. Dusk's direction aligns with the trend of institutional finance migrating on-chain, and interest from institutional users is indeed increasing.

DUSK2.02%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevHunter

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance integration, this approach has indeed impressed many institutions. The data from 20,000 nodes also shows that there are real users involved, unlike some projects that just talk big.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance and compliance at the same time? It's easy to say, but truly achieving it is extremely rare. Dusk's combination of zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, and other techniques does have some potential, but will institutions really buy into it? 20,000 nodes sound impressive, but what about the conversion rate? Can DWK hold up in the long run? Privacy and regulation have always been at odds. Can Hedger truly balance them, or is it just theoretical? By the way, the high enthusiasm for the testnet definitely shows that someone is seriously working on this, unlike some projects that just shout slogans.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance with a dual approach, this idea is indeed different. How are institutions planning to get on the chain?

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance and getting both? If this approach really works, the door for traditional financial institutions to enter the chain will truly open.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationAlert

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance with a dual approach, this idea is truly brilliant, institutions should get on board

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 10h ago

Privacy compliance win-win sounds good, but can it really be implemented? 20,000 nodes look promising, but we have to wait for mainnet data to speak.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 10h ago

Balancing privacy compliance on both fronts is indeed rare; will institutions really pay the bill? --- Twenty thousand nodes is not a small number, but it depends on the retention rate. --- The zero-knowledge proof set has been old news for a while; what makes Dusk stand out? --- Compliance sounds good in theory, but in practice, who knows how it will turn out. --- How does the DWK incentive mechanism work? Can you share some details? --- Privacy and compliance are inherently opposed; can they truly coexist? I remain skeptical. --- Institutionalizing finance on the blockchain sounds very difficult; Dusk dares to take on this task. --- Complete audits are good, but can it still be called privacy... it's a contradiction. --- Increased institutional interest ≠ guaranteed usage; that's two different things. --- I'm just worried it's another hype cycle; let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0