Looking at the trends in DeFi over the past couple of years, it has gradually shifted from a phase of purely hype-driven speculation back to rationality. Ultimately, what determines the winners and losers now are the fundamental needs for privacy protection and data security. This is also why I have been paying close attention to protocols like Walrus — they don’t just shout about decentralization all day long, but instead start from the most basic architectural layer, fundamentally changing the logic of data storage and protection, and forging a truly differentiated path.



Let me talk about its storage mechanism, which I believe is the most hardcore part. When applications based on this protocol store files, there’s no centralized server that can be compromised in a single attack as in traditional systems. Files are first encrypted, then split into countless fragments, and dispersed across various nodes. Even if a node is hacked, the attacker only gets invalid fragment data. Without the private key, it’s impossible to piece everything back together or read the actual content. This distributed security system is far more credible than projects that hype Web3 but lack real action.

This architecture also inherently possesses censorship resistance. Whether it’s personal asset information or sensitive internal data of institutions, there are storage solutions that do not rely on centralized trust. As regulatory pressures intensify and geopolitical conflicts flare up, this feature is no longer just a bonus but has become an essential requirement.

Looking at its token design — it’s not a speculative chip for hype, but rather a mechanism that, through governance and staking, truly decentralizes the control of the network to participants. When you contribute to the network’s security, the system provides you with corresponding value feedback. The logic is straightforward and practical. I believe that in the next phase of DeFi competition, the protocols that will succeed are those like this — low-profile but laying a solid technical foundation. Projects that constantly hype concepts will eventually be weeded out by the market.
WAL1.2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGoblinvip
· 01-12 07:53
Indeed, projects that shout slogans every day should have died long ago. Walrus, which focuses on solid fundamentals from the ground up, is more reliable. --- Distributed storage is definitely more reliable than centralized systems. Even if hackers are skilled, obtaining fragments is useless. --- However, the actual implementation of token design is another matter. I'll see how things develop before making any conclusions. --- Privacy and security have truly become essential in recent years. Finally, some projects are taking them seriously. --- Compared to those garbage projects that hype concepts, Walrus at least has some substance. Unfortunately, too few people are paying attention. --- Wait, this mechanism resists censorship, but can it really guarantee permanent safety? Are the nodes sufficiently decentralized? --- Sounds good, but I just want to know how many real applications are actually using this technology.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 01-12 07:53
Fragmented storage is truly a brilliant move, much more reliable than those who constantly shout about decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapistvip
· 01-12 07:51
Not to hype or criticize, Walrus's approach is indeed quite interesting. The idea of fragmented storage is much more reliable than those projects that just shout slogans every day. The private key is the real key; without it, it's just a pile of junk data. This design is quite ruthless. The token mechanism doesn't seem overly flashy; instead, it feels pragmatic. But we'll have to see how well the execution follows through. The architecture is definitely a weak point. Compared to the risk of centralized servers being cut off at once, the path of distributed protection is indeed the future. Will the anti-censorship attribute be targeted once it becomes popular? That's a question. This low-key protocol is easy to overlook, but often, that's where the most vitality lies. Token design isn't just about gambling chips; the market should have already voted with its feet to eliminate those air projects. Fragmented file storage means hackers can only get garbage, and that logic is still very solid.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTsvip
· 01-12 07:50
Really, Walrus's setup is much more solid than those projects that boast every day. Just by looking at the architecture, you can tell it's made by people who are serious about their work. Fragmented storage + private key encryption, this is the real defense line, not some fake security that can be broken with a single poke. Speaking of which, projects still hyping concepts won't last long. Hey, is this governance token mechanism really implementable, or is it just another trick? Over the past few years, it's clear that projects with solid technology win, while those that just boast die out. Wait, this anti-censorship attribute... in this environment, it's truly a necessity. Walrus is a bit too low-key; why hasn't anyone mentioned it?
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictimvip
· 01-12 07:48
Oops, another old tune of claiming to be technically hardcore while actually talking about storage fragmentation. Walrus is indeed interesting, but exaggerating everything as "must-have" is a bit much.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)