Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Why Iraq and Iran Represent the Same Geopolitical Game
Most headlines treat Iraq, Iran, and Venezuela as separate crises. They’re not. They’re all chapters in the same story—and it has nothing to do with oil shortages. It’s about who controls the system that moves oil around the world.
The Real Lesson From Iraq
Twenty years ago, Iraq wasn’t a “security threat.” It was a system threat. When Iraq began pricing oil outside the dollar framework and shifting settlements away from U.S.-controlled channels, the response wasn’t diplomatic. It was decisive. The lesson was clear: challenge the currency system, and you challenge the order itself.
Today’s Iran and Venezuela face the same pressure—not because they pump oil, but because they’re trying to break free from the dollar-denominated payment infrastructure.
How Modern Control Actually Works
Here’s what most people miss: controlling oil doesn’t require controlling oil fields. It requires controlling the ecosystem around the oil.
China understood this perfectly:
Iran ships 1.4–1.6 million barrels daily, with the majority flowing to China through discounted channels that avoid traditional payment rails. Venezuela exports 700,000–900,000 barrels per day, with China as its primary buyer and creditor through supply-backed debt agreements.
This isn’t just commerce. It’s structural control over who gets paid and how.
The Financial Warfare Framework
When the U.S. couldn’t “break” Iran and Venezuela militarily, it switched tactics. Instead of targeting countries, sanctions targeted the infrastructure:
One by one, the system gets restricted. You don’t need to invade; you need to isolate. And once you control who ships, who insures, and who settles payments, you own the outcome—regardless of who owns the wells.
This is identical to what happened to Iraq, just repackaged for a different era.
The Currency Question Explains Everything
Iraq and Iran share something profound: both challenged dollar dominance in energy markets. That’s not just an economic move—it’s a structural rebellion.
When oil moves outside dollar settlement, it undermines:
Suddenly, the U.S. doesn’t have a “military problem.” It has a system maintenance problem. And system maintenance looks very different from war.
What’s Actually Happening Now
The pressure on Iran and Venezuela isn’t random policy. It’s systematic:
Without the ability to ship, insure, and settle payments, oil wealth becomes worthless wealth. You can pump all you want, but if no one can buy it, you’re extracting for nothing.
Why This Matters for Understanding Global Systems
The deeper pattern: the fight isn’t over resources—it’s over the rails that move resources.
When systems shift, fortunes shift. Iraq learned this. Iran is learning it now. Venezuela is learning it alongside Iran. And China is positioned as both a solution and a strategic player, offering alternative pathways that bypass the traditional U.S.-controlled framework.
Understanding this framework changes how you read every headline about sanctions, shipping disputes, and energy politics. It’s not about oil scarcity or military intervention. It’s about who gets to decide how value moves through the global economy—and Iraq and Iran remain central to that question.
The rich study systems. When you see why Iraq and Iran face similar pressure, you’re seeing how modern geopolitical leverage actually works.