Many people, when mentioning privacy coins, their first reaction is often transaction lag, delisting by exchanges, and compliance pitfalls. But DUSK might break this stereotype — because its design logic is completely different.



There was a time when privacy coins were considered a hot potato. Slow transactions, poor liquidity, high regulatory risks — these are all well-known issues. It wasn’t until I heard about the experience of someone engaged in cross-border trade that I realized: traditional bank transfers not only have outrageous fees and sluggish speeds but also require reporting customer lists and purchase prices, making business privacy virtually nonexistent. This prompted a reevaluation of the privacy coin approach.

After careful analysis, I found that DUSK’s approach is actually the opposite. It’s not about hiding everything, but about selectively protecting data within a compliant framework. In simple terms: you can prove to regulators that your transactions are legal without exposing trade secrets. This design elevates it from a “geek’s toy” to a “usable financial tool.”

The most convincing evidence is real-world cases. Seeing someone complete cross-border settlement using the EURQ stablecoin within the DUSK ecosystem — same-day settlement, less than 1% fee, encrypted transactions — I finally understood that DUSK’s true competitors are not other niche coins, but financial giants like SWIFT and traditional securities clearing systems.

So, from a different perspective, $DUSK is not just a coin. It’s a privacy infrastructure within a compliant financial system, aimed at enterprise applications, not a tool for speculators. Its value depends on how much real assets are flowing through it, not market sentiment. Recently, staking has surpassed $120 million, and RWA applications are rolling out one after another, which perhaps says something.

If you only care about today’s price movements, DUSK might not be your pick. But if you’re optimistic about a future where finance requires both privacy and compliance, it’s worth adding to your watchlist and taking the time to understand deeply.
DUSK8.62%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
quiet_lurkervip
· 8h ago
Now I finally understand, privacy coins are not necessarily bad actors; it all depends on how they are used. To be honest, I used to have a stereotypical impression of privacy coins, but this logic sounds interesting now. The DUSK approach is indeed counterintuitive, selectively protecting within a compliant framework, and it feels like they've found a balance. Cross-border settlements are credited on the same day with a fee of less than 1%, which is true competitiveness. Staking over 100 million definitely shows that someone is serious about playing, not just hype. It's worth paying long-term attention to this direction; real asset circulation is the real indicator.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentryvip
· 8h ago
Listening to this logic, it's quite interesting, but can the group of old guys at SWIFT really be shaken? It seems like it still depends on how many institutions actually use it. Compliance and privacy are indeed the right directions, but I'm just worried it might turn into another concept coin. Staking 120 million sounds impressive, but what about real-world applications? I agree with the cross-border trade angle. The traditional banking system is indeed garbage, but whether DUSK can truly overtake by taking a shortcut remains to be seen. We shouldn't get cut off. The transaction fee on the same day is less than 1%. If that's really the case, it's worth considering. You have to experience it yourself to know. Has it been adopted for enterprise-level applications, or is it mainly the crypto community speculating? The difference is huge. It feels like many projects have this problem.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMevip
· 8h ago
Oops, no one has really figured out the compliance and privacy combo punch yet. DUSK's approach seems to have found something. The cross-border trade example really hit me; the traditional banking system is indeed completely rotten. Is EURQ really credited on the same day? I'm a bit curious to see what the actual operation looks like. Has the staking exceeded 120 million? That number is quite interesting, indicating that some people are indeed throwing money in. But honestly, whether this kind of thing can finally succeed depends on how regulators view it. Compliance topics are too easy to change unexpectedly. It seems DUSK is heading the B-end route, unlike those crazy coins that bounce around every day. This is the kind of proper financial infrastructure it should have.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagicvip
· 9h ago
Hey, this angle is fresh. The issue of compliance and privacy has indeed been overthought. The pain points of doing cross-border business for buddies have been hit; that banking system is really outrageous. DUSK's approach is good—it's not about hiding or concealing, but selective protection. That’s what makes it work. Transaction fees under 1% and same-day arrival? Faster than SWIFT by a mile, haha. But honestly, it still depends on how much real asset circulation there is; hype doesn't mean much. Staking surpassing 120 million is a bit interesting; maybe someone is really using it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)