Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#UNI代币销毁 Seeing the combination of UNI burn and fee zeroing, I have to calmly say a few honest words.
On the surface, it looks great—1 billion UNI burned, application fees completely waived. This kind of "positive" signal can easily create FOMO. But I’ve experienced too many setbacks on-chain and have learned to ask a few questions first: Who bears the cost of the burn? Who truly benefits from the fee zeroing?
To put it plainly, this is a typical "release liquidity dividends" tactic. When fee income decreases, they create scarcity expectations through token burns to drive up the price. Short-term, it’s indeed tempting, but what about long-term? When the ecosystem’s prosperity doesn’t meet expectations, no amount of burning can save the fundamentals.
My advice is: don’t be fooled by the burned numbers. What really matters is whether the Unichain ecosystem can truly take off, whether LP yields can genuinely increase through discount auctions, rather than just focusing on token price fluctuations. Having gone through too many reversals from "positive signals" to "exit scams" in this cycle, vigilance must always be maintained.
Caution ≠ denial, but before taking action, you must clearly understand your exit conditions and risk tolerance.