Is the US Bitcoin reserve cooling down? Divergence in official policy enforcement

【Crypto World】The issue of U.S. Bitcoin reserve building has once again stirred controversy. A senator recently pointed out that federal agencies seem to have been less than diligent in executing the March strategic asset protection executive order. Specifically, the U.S. Marshals Service confiscated a batch of Bitcoin in a case, but these assets were subsequently liquidated and transferred to a compliant custody platform.

This approach clearly contradicts the original intent of the executive order—the core goal of which is to keep digital assets in strategic reserves to meet future asset allocation needs. The Marshals Service later responded that they had not sold any assets in violation of the order, but there appears to be a disagreement between the two parties regarding the standards for asset disposal.

This reflects a real issue: the U.S. government’s attitude towards digital assets like Bitcoin is changing, but coordination at the implementation level still needs to be strengthened. As macroeconomic conditions shift and inflation pressures persist, the deployment of national strategic assets is becoming increasingly important. Bitcoin, as a non-correlated asset, is still being explored for its role in national asset allocation.