Under the regulatory framework, the "creative breakthrough" (why trading platforms and wallet applications are competing for this)



Regulations make one thing clear: token issuers cannot directly pay interest to users. But this doesn't mean the game is over.

Trading platforms, wallets, and various third-party applications have completely different identities. They can leverage their business models to offer users rewards in various forms — which is precisely the current focus of competition.

The reason why this policy gap has become a "battlefield" is key: the incentive space at the platform level is much larger than that of the issuers, and users' profit mechanisms can be more flexible and diverse. Some compliant exchanges are redefining user value through trading mining, ecosystem tokens, VIP levels, and other methods, bypassing direct restrictions on issuers. This means that the growth momentum of the ecosystem has not been completely frozen, but has shifted from one dimension to another.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
InscriptionGrillervip
· 3h ago
Ha, it's that same trick of "changing disguises to cut" again. As long as the regulators haven't shut it down completely, they will keep exploiting it.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 3h ago
Haha, this is the art of walking the fine line. When regulators shut down one issuer, they just switch to a different disguise to continue profiting.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420vip
· 3h ago
Basically, it's just playing word games. As long as the issuer can't provide it, the platform can do so anyway. Emm, but it's hard to say how long this trick can last. Regulations will eventually catch up. This move has indeed found a loophole, but it feels like it will be blocked sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 3h ago
Ha, isn't this just playing "flexibility" within the legal framework? The left hand is slapped, but the right hand can still move. Smart as it is, this trick only fools naive newcomers who don't understand. How long can it really last? The platform-level incentives are indeed diverse, but to be honest, it's still the same leek harvesting logic just under a different disguise. How many people truly make money from trading mining? Most of it is just a numbers game. This thing will eventually be targeted too; regulation never focuses on just one loophole.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFearvip
· 3h ago
Ha, it's another game of cat and mouse with regulators. The platform has really studied the vulnerabilities thoroughly. --- That's why exchanges are so aggressive now, with various mining activities coming one after another, trying different ways to harvest profits. --- Basically, it's just playing dress-up; when the issuer gets blocked, the platform steps in. Anyway, users still have to obediently send money. --- Interesting, the smaller the gap, the more valuable it is. That's probably the logic in the crypto world. --- The VIP level system is really disgusting. The more money you have, the more you’re considered the boss. Luckily, I don’t play these games. --- Circumvent restrictions? Sounds compliant, but I still feel it's the same old trick. --- The platform's incentive space is indeed larger than that of the issuer. Looks like I should pay attention to what exchanges are doing rather than the coins.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)