Recently, I have been thinking about why I still remain optimistic about the upcoming market trends.



From a technical perspective, Bitcoin has been correcting from a high level for over three months now. Such a decline at this level should be considered a larger-scale adjustment according to regular cycles. If we look at this market cycle from a weekly perspective, a normal bear market rebound window should appear around the fourth month, which is why I previously believed that early January might be a reversal time window.

So the question is, where will this bullish trend go? I personally think it needs to at least test the psychological threshold of . Why do I say that? The level has several key functions: firstly, it can effectively repair the weekly chart pattern; secondly, it is sufficient to clear out the arbitrage space accumulated by prior short leverage.

How the market develops after reaching indeed depends on policy movements and news developments. However, from a longer-term perspective, I tend to believe that BTC will maintain an upward trend this year.

This judgment is mainly based on two factors. First is the global macro environment — 2026 is generally regarded as an active year in the traditional financial cycle. As a secondary product of the financial system, crypto assets usually benefit from liquidity expansion. The second, more direct reason is the monetary policy direction of various central banks. The US has started liquidity injection after the rate hike cycle, and China is also promoting economic stimulus policies. Major economies worldwide are engaging in monetary easing, which means that incremental funds and liquidity will inevitably seek new asset allocation channels. Cryptocurrencies, as highly liquid assets, will attract attention.

Combining technical cycle analysis and macroeconomic logic, the current bullish outlook still has fundamental support.
BTC4.99%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 4h ago
If you can't break through 100,000, then this theory must be overturned and started over. The gamble is whether the loose liquidity can really come in.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 4h ago
Can 100,000 break the bank? I think it's uncertain; it depends on the Federal Reserve's mood.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychologyvip
· 5h ago
If the 100,000 mark isn't broken, I'll keep bullish. Anyway, all my idle funds are invested.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuardvip
· 5h ago
⚠️ CRITICAL: this whole "100k psychological barrier" thesis conveniently ignores the smart contract vulnerability vectors in leverage liquidation mechanics during volatility spikes. DYOR before treating macro narratives as gospel, not financial advice.
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)