2026-01-16 07:29:57

The truth is upfront: whether Web3 can resolve the contradiction between privacy and compliance directly determines the scale of large capital entering the market. That’s also why this direction is worth paying attention to.

Many people are confused about the positioning of certain projects. Breaking it down, it’s actually simple—they are privacy infrastructure on the RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) track. Imagine: large institutions want to migrate hundreds of billions of assets onto the chain, but cannot make all transaction details public and transparent. This becomes an unavoidable challenge. On this front, some teams have already found technical solutions—ensuring absolute privacy for transactions without compromising the integrity of regulatory audits.

Don’t be fooled by short-term price fluctuations. The true support comes from years of technological accumulation and compliance exploration behind the scenes. In this round of privacy finance reshuffling, those who can perfect compliance capabilities will be the ultimate winners. This is not just an illusion; it’s laying the foundational infrastructure for future financial systems. Once you understand this, the opportunities ahead become much clearer.

RWA7.15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CountdownToBroke

· 5h ago

Bro, this perspective really hits the nail on the head. Privacy and compliance are inherently a deadlock; only those who truly solve it will have the right to speak. Institutions aren't fools. Without privacy protection, they wouldn't dare to go on the chain. This time, it's truly different. Will it still drop in the short term? Let's wait and see. The key is having a mature technical solution.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 5h ago

Privacy and compliance are really hurdles, but whoever can handle both at the same time will win. However, will institutions really buy in? It seems to depend on the speed of implementation. It's true that striving for excellence in compliance capabilities is important, but it's unclear which companies can truly achieve it. Tens of trillions in assets on the chain... Just thinking about it is exciting, but we also need to be cautious of projects that might scam retail investors. The combination of RWA+privacy definitely has imagination, but the key is to avoid it becoming another pseudo-demand. Will this reshuffle once again be a game of capital? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 6h ago

Privacy + compliance, this contradiction is really the key to large capital entry, no doubt about it. The RWA track needs such infrastructure to truly take off. Billions of assets are on the chain, but achieving both privacy and auditability is indeed a technical challenge. Teams that can do it will eventually stand out from the crowd. Price fluctuations are just illusions; the core is who can maintain their compliance system the longest. I'm just worried about another wave of concept hype, which might bury projects with real technical accumulation. After this reshuffle, we should be able to identify genuine infrastructure providers, much better than those relying on stories.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 6h ago

Privacy and compliance are really just false propositions. Large institutions simply do not trust black-box solutions on the chain; once regulation comes, they still have to reveal their cards.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 6h ago

Honestly, the balance between privacy and compliance is indeed a bottleneck issue for large institutions entering the market. Only by choosing the right direction can they reap the benefits. If you ask me, teams with deep technical expertise do have a chance, but right now there are still too many pseudo-necessities making noise here. Strong compliance capabilities are the only long-term way to survive; everything else is nonsense. In the privacy infrastructure track, whoever truly solves the pain points of institutions will win. So far, I haven't seen any particularly sensible solutions. Short-term gamblers will ultimately suffer losses, but this time is different. The combination of RWA + privacy can indeed change the game if executed well. Sounds good, but the implementation is often the most dramatic, so I look forward to being proven wrong.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 6h ago

ah yes, *checks notes* the classic "institutional adoption requires privacy+compliance" thesis... we literally said this exact thing in 2017 before the $3.6k capitulation phase lmao. history doesn't repeat but man does it rhyme.

Reply0