#数字资产市场动态 has been involved in digital asset trading for several years, and increasingly perceives a pattern: the principal size is not the decisive factor; psychological resilience is.



Those beginners who jump into the market with a few hundred or a few thousand dollars often have only one obsession in mind — a quick gamble, to multiply their gains and achieve a reversal of fortune. What’s the reality? Funds don’t double, but the account crashes.

At the beginning of the month, a girl working in design asked me for advice. She was very honest: "I saved my two years’ worth of salary as principal, 80,000 USDT. Last month, I lost so much on futures trading that I only have 13,000 left. I don’t understand technical analysis, so I want to ask — is there still hope?"

My answer is yes, but only if you strictly follow the plan.

**Phase One: Stop the Bleeding and Clear Positions**
I asked her to provide a screenshot of her account. The result was obvious — high leverage, confused direction, some positions still in reverse. My instructions were straightforward: "Close everything, no matter how much floating loss there is. Clearing positions is the first step in stopping the bleeding."

**Phase Two: Rebuild the Trading System**
The remaining 13,000 USDT was divided into 10 parts, each time only using one part to enter the market; when a single position’s loss reaches 5%, stop loss immediately; when floating profit exceeds 30%, close half to realize gains and transfer to wallet. She was a bit anxious: "How long will it take to get back to 80,000?" I told her: "What you need now isn’t speed, but to avoid continuing pointless losses."

**Phase Three: Focus on Core Assets**
I told her to focus only on $BTC and $SOL. At that time, $BTC was stabilizing around 86,500, with small bullish candles on the 4-hour chart, volume gradually increasing. I asked her to place a buy order at 86,638 with 10% of her position. She nervously asked: "Will it keep falling?" I replied: "We’re not betting on the rise or fall; we’re waiting for a more favorable probability moment."

Three days later, $BTC surged past 88,000, with floating gains close to 8,000 USDT. When closing the position, she sent me a voice message: "I feel like my thinking has become clearer."

That same week, $SOL built a strong support at 133. Its chart performance was more stable than the overall market. I replicated a similar position layout and set stop-loss. Yesterday, $SOL rose to 136, and she secured steady profits again.

Last night, she sent a screenshot — her 13,000 USDT account had grown to over 60,000 USDT. Achieving multiple times growth within a month. Trembling, she asked: "Am I finally out of the pit?"

I told her: "You’ve been out of the pit for a while. The moment you decided to stop blindly operating, you already completed the transformation."

**Core Insight**
The market doesn’t care about the size of your principal; it fears impulsiveness, unwillingness to admit mistakes, and lack of patience. Conversely, small funds actually hold an advantage — they allow repeated trial and error with small units, gradually integrating correct methods into habits.

For friends who want to steadily accumulate profits and carefully avoid traps, there’s no need to explore blindly alone in the crypto world. By controlling the rhythm, establishing a system, and using scientific logic to profit steadily, this path is achievable.
BTC-1.29%
SOL-1.11%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
cqing58vip
· 5h ago
The market doesn't care about the size of your principal amount
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 5h ago
Really, mindset > principal. I truly understand this point. Exactly, I'm just afraid of that impulsive all-in move. Losing from 80,000 to 13,000... it's heartbreaking, but then doubling back up is also a great recovery. The key is still that stop-loss discipline; too many people just refuse to admit mistakes. BTC was indeed stable at that position, no wonder it consistently profits. From 13,000 to 60,000, now that's the right way to open up. I also want to use small funds to refine my trading system; the psychological pressure of all-in is much lower.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 5h ago
Stopping bleeding is the key, greed is the real killer --- 80,000 loss down to 13,000, I've also experienced this kind of despair, just refusing to admit fault --- The key is this guy didn't boast, the data is solid and laid out there, I admire that --- Small funds are actually easier to develop good habits, large investors are more prone to reckless behavior --- That girl was able to reach 60,000 in the end, the core isn't strategy but that she listened to advice --- High leverage is truly poison, now whenever I see someone say "all-in," I just want to laugh --- BTC and SOL operate on a dual-track system, this idea is so simple it's incredible --- Honestly, most people fail because of the words "stop loss" --- How much psychological preparation is needed to clear out positions? That’s the hardest step --- So are you still trading now? Are you still operating with that girl? --- 5% stop loss, 30% reduction in position size, I need to remember these numbers
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 5h ago
It's really true, mindset > principal. Very few people understand this principle. The batch that used to play all-in is long gone; only those who learned to cut losses survived. That girl’s example really hit me—losing 80,000 to 13,000 and still able to bounce back. The key is to listen to advice; otherwise, continuing to gamble with a sharp tongue and a soft heart will only lead to death. But I still think that even the best system needs to be refined by oneself. Copying others’ plans always misses something. BTC and SOL are indeed stable this round, but I must emphasize the risk warning again—contracts really can make people lose their minds.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightningvip
· 5h ago
Stopping the bleeding is the first step; many people die because they are unwilling to cut losses at this hurdle. Losing from 80,000 to 13,000 and still turning around shows that adjusting your mindset is the turning point. I agree that small funds repeatedly trying and erroring has its advantages, but the premise is having a true sense of rules. This case has a bit of a motivational feel, but the logical framework is indeed correct. Psychological resilience >> principal, there's no problem with this statement, but most people can't do it.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblinvip
· 5h ago
Hey, this story sounds too much like a textbook. Can you really lose that much by just going all-in on a contract? Honestly, mindset is really important, but I think the most crucial thing is to avoid falling into the high leverage trap. Losing 80,000 down to 13,000—what kind of operation is that... But then rebounding to 60,000 is kind of impressive. In my experience, stop-loss is easy to talk about but really hell to implement. Most people simply can't do it. Choosing BTC and SOL was a pretty good move, but it feels a bit like hindsight analysis. I agree with sticking to small units for trial and error; the risk is much more controllable, though it’s just earning some pocket money. Can mental toughness really decide everything? I think most people still get wrecked by leverage and greed.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)