2026-01-16 08:27:52

Walrus has been trending recently—$WAL doubled in seven days. Many are just watching the excitement, while others are digging for deeper insights. What makes this project interesting is that supporters praise its solid security architecture, while skeptics point out vulnerabilities in the code. In reality, this is common for any truly reliable project; only those that can withstand public scrutiny are worth paying attention to.

Numbers speak for themselves. By 2025, Walrus's user base grew from 5,000 to 50,000 in just three months, a 900% increase. Such a sharp rise in price is usually not just hype; it often reflects real underlying changes.

Its long-term story is roughly like this: with the advent of the AI era, all intelligent systems need data. The question is, who ensures that this data is authentic and trustworthy? That’s what Walrus aims to do—build a decentralized storage infrastructure to provide reliable, verifiable data sources for various AI applications. From this perspective, it’s not just a storage tool but more like the infrastructure for AI systems. There’s room for optimization in its current implementation, but the direction is correct.

In simple terms, trading cryptocurrencies is easy, but understanding the project is hard. Watching the price fluctuate wildly every day, many people get carried away by emotions. But real opportunities come from understanding the essence of the project, not just chasing market trends blindly. Walrus’s story is still being written, and it’s worth taking a closer look with a cool head.

WAL3.2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainBrain

· 8h ago

A 900% increase sounds incredible, but I care more about whether the user base has truly grown from 5k to 50k—that's the real indicator of whether the product is being used. --- AI data validation is indeed a good angle; now it's just a matter of whether it can truly be implemented into a product. It's still too early. --- Another project with the "right direction." I just want to know when it can turn from theory into reality. --- It's actually good to have more skeptical voices; it shows the market is paying attention, making it more reliable than those nobody cares about. --- I've seen many double in value, but the key is whether it can sustain over the next three months—that's the real test. --- Decentralized storage + AI is a very attractive story, but we need to be cautious about this theme being overhyped by capital. --- A cool-headed view supports this suggestion, but the reality is most people are chasing hype, myself included. --- A 900% user growth is a hard metric; it can't be faked, I believe in that. --- Feels like yet another project being hyped up, waiting to see if it will crash later. --- Code vulnerabilities are normal; the question is whether they've been seriously fixed—that's what separates genuine projects from fake ones.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 8h ago

A 900% growth is indeed impressive, but those who haven't used the product start to jerk off—that's the real risk.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 8h ago

A 900% increase is honestly a bit scary, but the user base has really grown, and that's the key point, right? The AI data verification demand really hits the mark; it's not just hype. It's normal for code to have vulnerabilities; only those that can withstand scrutiny are reliable, I agree with that. Price swings are like a roller coaster; those who follow are all just the bagholders. It still depends on the fundamentals. Wait, can Walrus really be used now, or is it still just in the conceptual stage?

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 8h ago

I was drawn in by WAL's hype; a 900% increase is indeed impressive, but I believe there's more than just hype behind it. Thinking calmly, AI indeed requires trustworthy data sources, and this logic makes sense. It's normal for code to have vulnerabilities; open-source projects are meant to withstand scrutiny, which actually shows they are willing to be transparent. A user base that has increased tenfold in three months is no small feat; this is a real signal of genuine demand. Wait, are there really that many people using it? Or are they just piling up account addresses? We need to look at the data again. However, AI infrastructure is definitely the right direction; it's much more reliable than projects that are purely hype. When prices are swinging wildly every day, it's easiest to get caught off guard; understanding the project itself is more important than just looking at K-line charts. Now I realize this project—maybe it's a bit late to enter the market.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 8h ago

A 900% increase sounds crazy, but the surge in user numbers clearly indicates there's something there. Can WAL hold this wave? The key still depends on whether the code can withstand the testing. Data credibility issues—this is indeed a pressing need in the AI era, and it's a real pain point. I'm used to price rollercoasters; mainly, it depends on whether these folks can make the product solid. Don't be blinded by hype; only calm analysis can help find real opportunities. Code vulnerabilities are nothing new; the key is how the team fixes them. The AI infrastructure positioning is good, but it depends on whether adoption can keep up.

View OriginalReply0