LISTA has indeed attracted attention recently, with many online discussions, but most stay at the roadmap level. However, as participants, we focus on more pragmatic aspects—the support behind the token price.



First, let's talk about deflation. In August last year, the community voted to burn 200 million LISTA tokens, accounting for 20% of the total circulating supply. Compared to projects that burn small fees daily, this operation is on a completely different scale. Now, the total supply is only 800 million, with only 7.5% in circulation, most of which are still locked in unlock periods. This supply structure can indeed help ease selling pressure.

Next, consider the project’s own ability to generate value. LISTA is a lending platform on the BNB Chain, currently locking in $4.3 billion in assets. The interest rates for borrowing tokens are often below 2%, which is quite attractive. The platform issues the lisUSD stablecoin and slisBNB staking derivatives (with an annual yield of 7.2%), all operational. Recently, the new RWA (Real-World Asset) business is even more interesting—issuing US debt tokens and taking a 5% management fee. These are actual income streams. In the future, with the launch of credit loans, prediction markets, and other features, revenue channels will diversify further.

Where does the dual driver of the token price come from? First, the ecosystem’s revenue from buyback and burn mechanisms; second, market expectations for future development. The current comprehensive ecosystem roadmap is the core carrier of these expectations—if it can truly attract more liquidity from Ethereum, scale up the RWA business, and strengthen credit lending, the potential is quite significant.

But risks are also present. Five directions are advancing simultaneously, and whether the team’s execution can keep up is a big question. Credit lending is especially sensitive—if risk control fails, it could lead to a chain of bad debts. Plus, everyone knows how fierce the competition in DeFi is; each niche segment has players. For LISTA to break through is not easy.

My personal stance? Not to buy at high prices. Treat it as a long-term target within the BNB Chain ecosystem, but be mentally prepared to handle volatility.
LISTA-3.79%
BNB0.46%
ETH0.5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocDetectivevip
· 6h ago
The deflationary力度确实够狠,200 million directly burned, which is not on the same level as projects that burn transaction fees daily. 4.3 billion locked, borrowing interest rate below 2%, RWA deducts 5% management fee... this血液逻辑怎么看都更solid一些 But honestly,信用贷 is the biggest risk. Once risk control collapses, it's over. It's correct to avoid buying at high levels. Long-term targets can be关注, but be prepared psychologically.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMastervip
· 6h ago
Destroying 20% of the circulation is indeed a bold move, but to be honest, if the risk control fails, everything is for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 6h ago
Hmm... a 20% direct burn is indeed ruthless, but once the risk control fails, credit loans are finished.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetectorvip
· 6h ago
Hey, that 5% management fee on RWA sounds pretty good, but I'm just worried it might be another empty promise. Are they really willing to expand credit lending so broadly? We've seen too many DeFi bad debt scenarios. The deflationary measures are indeed aggressive; destroying 20% outright is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalalvip
· 6h ago
This wave of deflation is indeed intense, destroying 20% in one go, much more aggressive than those projects that burn small amounts daily. The 4.3 billion locked-up tokens indicate that some people still recognize the attractiveness of borrowing rates below 2%, but you really need to be cautious with credit loans—one risk control loophole and everything could be lost. The 5% management fee for RWA sounds like a lot, but I worry that the subsequent implementation might not meet expectations. Launching five initiatives simultaneously, whether the team can hold up is still uncertain. Instead of chasing highs, it's better to wait for adjustments. For long-term play, the BNB ecosystem is indeed a target, but you need to mentally prepare for big fluctuations. I want to ask if the credit loan launch time has been confirmed; this is the key to the entire logic.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 6h ago
The deflation aspect really hits the point; a 20% direct burn is not a joke, much more substantial than those nonsense projects that burn fees every day. I'm a bit skeptical about RWA; can the US debt token really take off, or is it just another PPT project? Once the credit loan crashes, it's all over; this risk must be guarded against. Long-term optimistic but hesitant to buy at high levels; the volatility is too great, can't handle the stress.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)