Every ecosystem is not short of leading players, but those who truly win the hearts of the community are often the projects that operate quietly, honing their craft and persevering against the wind. Take some Layer 2 solutions or underlying public chains, for example—their approach is like an ant moving house—seemingly mundane and repetitive, but secretly strategic.



From a technical perspective, these projects do not chase short-term hype; instead, they steadily improve their tools: upgrading on-chain throughput, perfecting cross-chain channels, and laying out application ecosystems. Code iterations, feature launches—every move is about accumulation. This patient and unhurried attitude contrasts sharply with those projects eager to "get rich quick" and gobble up everything at once. Time will gradually reveal whose choices are more valuable.

From a market perspective, small projects facing big players do not recklessly clash head-on; instead, they find their niche and unique value. Just like ants change their routes when facing predators, they identify opportunities precisely, quickly adjust strategies, and gradually expand their influence. This flexibility and resilience can sometimes open a gap more effectively than direct confrontation.

You will find that the projects that go the furthest are not driven by a single round of funding or a wave of marketing hype. They strike a balance between deep technical development and market patience, earning trust little by little through tangible progress and ecosystem building.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TeaTimeTradervip
· 7h ago
The ant moving house metaphor is excellent, but honestly, most people are just gambling on that wave of marketing... There are very few who can truly sit through it.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 7h ago
Really, you can tell just by looking at those projects that stay quiet and make big money. Don’t just follow the crowd shouting slogans all day; honestly writing code is the real skill. --- Well said, but frankly, many projects still end up dying in funding rounds. --- Low-key? Ha, who’s still low-key now? Projects without hype are nobody’s concern. --- I’ve heard this kind of rhetoric so many times, but the key is whether they can really survive until next year. --- The analogy of ants moving house is pretty good, but in reality, the ants often get stepped on before they finish moving. --- I agree, those projects that seek quick gains are doomed not to go far; the market just loves to watch that. --- Segmented niche tracks sound simple, but finding them is the hard part. Most small projects get stuck at this step. --- Technical accumulation is important, but without funding support, such accumulation is pointless—that’s the harsh truth. --- Time proves everything, but the cycle in the crypto market is much shorter than in traditional industries. --- Not bad writing, but why does it sound so much like a motivational chicken soup? Are there still projects truly persevering now?
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but how many projects can truly withstand a bear market?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)