2026-01-18 08:21:15

Looking at RIVER's movement around 23.7, contract data is often the decisive factor for price fluctuations. When the consolidation range is broken or breached, what does it indicate? Either the trapped and profit-taking orders have been fully released, or the opposing side's losses are large enough to push the price through this critical level. If neither of these conditions is met, the price will usually return to its original position or undergo a wave of range trading to fill this price gap.

Regarding quantitative trading, it indeed has advantages, but this advantage is not as absolute as many people think. Truly strong quantitative strategies are never purely reliant on algorithms; they combine solid data analysis with quantitative tools. Data must be precise for the strategy to be accurate. Merely stacking models will only lead to pitfalls.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProtocolRebel

· 6h ago

23.7 this level is indeed risky, the contract market can wipe you out Quantitative strategies are correct, relying solely on models really is just money in the bank If the data isn't precise, don't talk about strategies, in the end it's all arbitrage Will RIVER continue to crash this time? It depends on whether the opponents have lost money I've seen too many model players fall into traps, serves them right Breaking through key levels without real buy support, the rebound comes back fast and fierce Those who are stuck on data accuracy probably number around 800 to 900

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 6h ago

23.7 this level really traps people, contract data speaks for itself Quantitative methods... sound good but are actually just talk, those who truly make money have long been quietly making a fortune Who really knows if the data is accurate or not, everyone just claims their strategy is good

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 6h ago

23.7 is really stuck at this level; the contract market is too deceptive. Quantitative trading sounds impressive, but it's really just garbage data going in and garbage data coming out. No wonder so many people fail. The trapped orders are truly ghost orders. When will they finally disperse? A slight lack of data precision can cause the entire strategy to collapse—that's the reality. Swing arbitrage is just filling in the gaps; to put it nicely, it's actually just repeatedly cutting profits.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 7h ago

23.7 this level is indeed tricky, the contract data speaks for itself and is clear Quantitative strategies are right; most pure model-based ones have lost money. What are they still bragging about algorithm invincibility for? Data accuracy is insufficient; no matter how good the strategy is, it's useless This wave of RIVER will either explode or pull back, there is no third way If the breakout in the consolidation range can't be achieved, it's just a trap to lure buyers. In this kind of market, it's easiest to bottom fish and become the bag holder

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 7h ago

23.7 This critical level must be closely watched; when contract data moves, the price follows the dance. Quantitative sounds impressive, but in reality, solid data is essential. No matter how advanced the algorithm, it can't save garbage data. It's another round of filling the pits; don't expect a breakthrough until the trapped positions are released. The truly profitable quantitative strategies are simple and unpretentious; those built on complex models often die at some black swan event. Hope this rally can stabilize above 23.7.

View OriginalReply0