Distributed storage needs to truly take off, and data recovery efficiency is a crucial hurdle. Traditional solutions use RS erasure coding to ensure data security, which sounds good, but the reality is quite tough—restoring a piece of data requires downloading massive slices, running polynomial calculations, which takes a long time and consumes network bandwidth. The overall efficiency of the storage network is thus hampered, a common problem.



Walrus has a different approach. Its core competitiveness lies in the "Slice Collaborative Recovery" mechanism of RedStuff 2D encoding. The traditional method requires enough slices to restore data—fetch as many as needed. In contrast, Walrus establishes a tight logical mapping between primary slices and secondary slices, leveraging the reversible XOR operation. This allows recovery by fetching only a few primary and secondary slices. In other words, the number of slices needed is significantly reduced, and bandwidth consumption naturally drops.

Additionally, Walrus employs a "Proximity Recovery" tactic. The system prioritizes fetching slices from the node closest to the user, avoiding cross-region and cross-network data retrieval. Compared to traditional methods that transfer data from multiple remote nodes, this is a world of difference. Bandwidth pressure is eased, recovery speed is faster, and network efficiency is thus improved.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivorvip
· 6h ago
Oops, finally a project has thought of optimizing this pain point. The RS erasure coding set indeed drags down efficiency. Walrus's 2D coding approach this time has some merit, and local recovery is a brilliant move.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMOvip
· 6h ago
RS erasure coding really does hold things back, but the Walrus approach is still somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_earlyvip
· 6h ago
Walrus this time is really impressive. The combination of local recovery and slicing collaboration was executed beautifully, directly turning bandwidth issues from a pain point into an advantage. The traditional RS erasure coding system really should be phased out.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRatvip
· 6h ago
The walrus logic indeed has some substance, especially the XOR part, which can be restored with just a few slices... It saves much more bandwidth compared to traditional schemes.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_againvip
· 6h ago
Walrus this move is indeed impressive; the XOR operation part sounds more advanced than traditional RS codes... However, the nearby recovery trick is essentially just an old network optimization tactic, and only truly operational ones count.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuruvip
· 6h ago
Oh wow, Walrus's local recovery + slicing collaboration is truly excellent. I don't know how much better it is compared to the lagging RS erasure code方案.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 6h ago
Wait, Walrus's combination of proximity recovery + XOR reverse engineering, can it really significantly reduce bandwidth? It seems a bit exaggerated; I need to see actual benchmark results to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)