Recently, an interesting observation has been spreading in the community—the question of whether stablecoins are really good to use.

It seems simple, right? USDT and USDC are everywhere. But when actually used in high-frequency trading and transfer scenarios, old issues like slippage, insufficient liquidity depth, and transaction delays still pop up. Essentially, it's not about whether we can issue stablecoins, but about how to make them truly practical.

There's a project working on this—by integrating lending, exchange, and yield farming into a unified liquidity framework to improve capital efficiency. This approach isn't just about stacking concepts; it's genuinely addressing the pain points of trading depth and settlement efficiency. Currently, this project has contributed over 60% of DEX trading volume on a major blockchain, which itself speaks volumes.

Interestingly, developers no longer need to start from scratch to accumulate liquidity; they can directly deploy payment and settlement functions. This changes the previous slow and complicated integration process.

Looking outward, in places like Africa and Southeast Asia, stablecoins have long ceased to be investment assets—they are tools for daily transfers, payments, and small transactions. From this perspective, the significance of upgrading such infrastructure becomes even clearer.

DeFi is gradually shifting from storytelling to actually solving problems. Making operations smooth and providing a seamless user experience is more convincing than any marketing.