2026-01-18 10:42:35

#数字资产市场动态 Why are so many people paying attention to the Fed Chair candidate?$BTC $ETH $ZEC

A few days ago, Trump clarified a rumor — he never extended an invitation to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon to become Fed Chair. JPMorgan also confirmed this shortly after. At first glance, it seems like denying something that never actually happened, but there’s more to the story worth pondering.

What does the Fed Chair control? Essentially, it’s the key to influencing global finance. The rise and fall of crypto assets, stock market trends, interest rate decisions — all depend on whether it’s willing to play along. Such an important position has never been decided by a single person’s word; it requires congressional hearings and multiple layers of approval. Trump did consider Dimon for the role back then, but ultimately, it was dropped. Now that this is brought up again, JPMorgan quickly comes out to clarify — rather than outright denying, it’s more like a public "cutting ties" to ensure they aren’t caught in the political whirlpool.

Why bring this up now?

**Political level**: During the election window, any personnel changes in the financial sector will be amplified infinitely.

**Corporate stance**: Traditional financial giants most fear being dragged into political disputes. Proactively clarifying can reduce risks.

**Market reality**: The Fed Chair’s decisions directly impact monetary policy, influencing the entire ecosystem of US stocks and crypto assets. Whether it’s rate cuts or hikes, it’s a matter of life and death for assets like $BTC.

Ultimately, this seems like dredging up old issues, but it actually reflects the tense relationship between Wall Street and power. The big players are strategizing on stage, while we watch the spectacle and consider what it means for our wallets. But one thing to remember — every time such "old news" is recounted, it’s often a prelude to a major upcoming change.

What’s your take? If a Wall Street elite actually steps into the Federal Reserve building, would that be good or bad news for the crypto market? Share your thoughts.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rugdoc.eth

· 2h ago

Basically, it's Wall Street protecting itself, fearing to be dragged into political battles, which could directly harm BTC and cause collateral damage.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 2h ago

Basically, it's about who can control the printing press. For the crypto world, this is the big event.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMom

· 2h ago

Splitting? Isn't this just the old Wall Street trick—denying one thing while making you guess their true intentions, manipulating public opinion.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 2h ago

If Dimon really gets into the Federal Reserve, our BTC should have already skyrocketed to 100,000... Now it's all for nothing, just empty joy. JPMorgan's cutting operation this time is really cheap, clearly wanting it now but stubbornly denying it. I understand this feeling too well. Wall Street entering the Federal Reserve? Good for you, but in the end, it's still us retail investors getting harvested. The rich will always win. If it weren't for this farce, I would have gone all in long ago. Now? I have no confidence at all. Talking about clarifications, it's really just finger-pointing at each other. We’re just here to watch the show, but in the end, we’ll still get cut. Just listen, anyway, the big shots' decisions are beyond our control. It all depends on who holds more coins. Political whirlpool? Basically, it's a game of the powerful. Our wallets have never been within their consideration. If you ask me, once the Federal Reserve's candidate is truly decided, the market will have already reacted. We can only chase the high and buy in. Bringing up this Dimon thing is probably just testing the market reaction. The retail investors caught in this wave are the real "test subjects."

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer