MASK vs ARB: The Battle for Respiratory Protection in High-Risk Environments

Introduction: Investment Comparison of MASK vs ARB

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Mask Network vs Arbitrum has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

Mask Network (MASK): Since its launch in 2021, it has gained market recognition for its role as a portal helping users transition seamlessly from Web2.0 to Web3.0.

Arbitrum (ARB): Introduced in 2023, it has been hailed as an Ethereum scaling solution, enabling high-throughput, low-cost smart contracts while maintaining trustless security.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between MASK vs ARB, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerning to investors:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

MASK and ARB Historical Price Trends

• 2021: MASK reached its all-time high of $41.45 on February 25, 2021.
• 2023: ARB reached its all-time high of $4.00 on March 23, 2023.
• Comparative analysis: In the market cycle, MASK dropped from its high of $41.45 to a low of $0.647043, while ARB declined from $4.00 to $0.1054.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-17)

• MASK current price: $0.711
• ARB current price: $0.2358
• 24-hour trading volume: MASK $505,594.45 vs ARB $3,559,396.82
• Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 10 (Extreme Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• Check MASK current price Market Price
• Check ARB current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of MASK vs ARB

Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)

• MASK: Total supply of 100 million tokens with 39.05% currently in circulation. Features a deflationary mechanism through token burns, enhancing value over time.
• ARB: Maximum supply capped at 10 billion tokens with a strategic distribution plan: 42.1% to the community, 26.9% to the Arbitrum Foundation, and 31% to investors and team members.
• 📌 Historical pattern: Deflationary mechanisms like MASK's token burns tend to create upward price pressure long-term, while ARB's larger but strategically distributed supply typically supports ecosystem growth and broader adoption.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional holdings: ARB has gained stronger institutional backing, with support from Coinbase Custody and increased institutional trading volume on major exchanges.
• Enterprise adoption: MASK Protocol focuses on social media privacy and data ownership applications, while Arbitrum provides scaling solutions for enterprises requiring high-throughput blockchain applications.
• Regulatory attitudes: Both projects face varied regulatory treatment globally, with privacy-focused MASK potentially facing greater scrutiny in jurisdictions prioritizing transparency.

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

• MASK technical upgrades: Integration with major social platforms (Twitter, Facebook), decentralized file system support, and privacy-preserving features that enable Web3 social interactions.
• ARB technical development: Arbitrum Orbit allowing creation of custom L3 chains, Stylus enabling developers to use additional programming languages, and optimistic rollup technology reducing Ethereum gas fees by up to 97%.
• Ecosystem comparison: ARB has a more developed DeFi ecosystem with significant TVL across numerous protocols, while MASK leads in social media integration and decentralized social applications.

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

• Performance during inflation: ARB's infrastructure role may provide more stability during inflationary periods compared to MASK's more specialized use case.
• Monetary policy impacts: Both tokens show sensitivity to broader crypto market trends following Federal Reserve decisions, with smaller-cap MASK potentially exhibiting higher volatility.
• Geopolitical factors: MASK's privacy features may see increased demand during periods of heightened surveillance or censorship, while ARB benefits from general growth in demand for Ethereum scaling solutions.

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: MASK vs ARB

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• MASK: Conservative $0.65 - $0.71 | Optimistic $0.71 - $0.86
• ARB: Conservative $0.22 - $0.24 | Optimistic $0.24 - $0.26

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• MASK may enter a growth phase, with expected prices $0.48 - $1.20
• ARB may enter a bullish trend, with expected prices $0.25 - $0.43
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• MASK: Base scenario $0.65 - $1.22 | Optimistic scenario $1.22 - $1.51
• ARB: Base scenario $0.49 - $0.55 | Optimistic scenario $0.55 - $0.78

View detailed price predictions for MASK and ARB

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

MASK:

ARB:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: MASK vs ARB

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

• MASK: Suitable for investors focused on Web3 social applications and privacy solutions
• ARB: Suitable for investors interested in Ethereum scaling solutions and DeFi ecosystem growth

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: MASK: 30% vs ARB: 70%
• Aggressive investors: MASK: 60% vs ARB: 40%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-token portfolio diversification

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risk

• MASK: Higher volatility due to smaller market cap and niche focus
• ARB: Susceptibility to Ethereum ecosystem fluctuations and Layer 2 competition

Technical Risk

• MASK: Integration challenges with major social platforms, privacy technology vulnerabilities
• ARB: Scalability issues, network stability during high congestion periods

Regulatory Risk

• Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts, with MASK potentially facing stricter scrutiny due to privacy features

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• MASK advantages: Unique position in Web3 social media, deflationary tokenomics
• ARB advantages: Strong institutional backing, established DeFi ecosystem, Ethereum scaling solution

✅ Investment Advice:

• New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight bias towards ARB due to its more established ecosystem
• Experienced investors: Explore a dynamic allocation strategy, adjusting based on market cycles and project milestones
• Institutional investors: Focus on ARB for its scaling solutions and potential for broader adoption in enterprise applications

⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between MASK and ARB? A: MASK focuses on Web3 social applications and privacy solutions, while ARB is an Ethereum scaling solution. MASK has a smaller market cap and higher volatility, whereas ARB has stronger institutional backing and a more developed DeFi ecosystem.

Q2: Which token has performed better historically? A: ARB has shown better price performance recently. While MASK reached its all-time high of $41.45 in February 2021, ARB's all-time high was $4.00 in March 2023. As of 2025-11-17, ARB is trading at $0.2358, while MASK is at $0.711.

Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of MASK and ARB differ? A: MASK has a total supply of 100 million tokens with a deflationary mechanism through token burns. ARB has a maximum supply of 10 billion tokens with a strategic distribution plan, including allocations to the community, Arbitrum Foundation, investors, and team members.

Q4: Which token is considered better for long-term investment? A: Both tokens have potential for long-term growth, but ARB may be considered more stable due to its stronger institutional backing and established ecosystem. MASK could be attractive for investors interested in Web3 social applications and privacy solutions.

Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in MASK and ARB? A: MASK faces higher volatility due to its smaller market cap and potential regulatory scrutiny of its privacy features. ARB is susceptible to Ethereum ecosystem fluctuations and competition from other Layer 2 solutions. Both tokens are subject to general cryptocurrency market risks.

Q6: How do institutional adoptions compare between MASK and ARB? A: ARB has gained stronger institutional backing, with support from Coinbase Custody and increased institutional trading volume on major exchanges. MASK has less institutional adoption but focuses more on individual user adoption through social media integrations.

Q7: What are the price predictions for MASK and ARB by 2030? A: By 2030, MASK is predicted to range from $0.65 to $1.51 in base and optimistic scenarios, respectively. ARB is expected to range from $0.49 to $0.78 in base and optimistic scenarios. However, these predictions are speculative and subject to market conditions.