

Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that records data in immutable blocks across a network of computers. This distributed database is reshaping how different industries manage, store, and record data. There are different iterations of these networks, with the most prominent being public and private blockchains.
A private blockchain, also known as a permissioned blockchain, is a distributed ledger in which a company or organization controls who can access the database, run nodes, and participate in consensus. These networks are only accessible to authorized chosen parties whose identities are verified by the controlling group. They operate within an exclusive and secure environment of companies or groups that prioritize information privacy.
Unlike public blockchains where anyone can participate, private blockchains create a controlled ecosystem where trust is established through identity verification rather than cryptographic proof alone. This fundamental difference makes private blockchains particularly suitable for enterprise applications where regulatory compliance, data privacy, and operational efficiency are paramount.
Private blockchains feature the same attributes as other blockchains, including distributed ledger technology, consensus mechanisms, immutability, and transparency. However, there are additional features that set private blockchains apart from their public counterparts.
Private blockchains are only accessible to authorized participants. As such, the blockchain's controlling entity decides who can join the network, can restrict access to data, and knows the identities of all the participants. Moreover, the controlling entity can also override or delete records when necessary.
This permissioned structure creates a hierarchical access system where different participants may have varying levels of privileges. For example, some participants might only have read access to specific portions of the ledger, while others can write and validate transactions. This granular control over permissions ensures that sensitive business information remains protected while still leveraging the benefits of distributed ledger technology.
Private blockchains are very selective about participants. The data and information related to participants have limited visibility, and confidentiality is paramount. Notably, onboarding participants based on invitation reduces the risk of malicious actors getting access to the network and enhances the participants' trust.
The security model of private blockchains combines traditional access control mechanisms with blockchain's inherent cryptographic security. By knowing the identity of every participant, the controlling organization can implement additional security layers such as multi-factor authentication, regular security audits, and immediate revocation of access if suspicious activity is detected.
Private blockchains use consensus mechanisms that fit the participants' needs. The controlling organization sets customized rules on operation, governance, and decision-making. A private blockchain consensus follows a structured process with pre-selected validators, often chosen by the controlling group.
This controlled consensus approach allows for greater flexibility in choosing mechanisms that prioritize speed and efficiency over the Byzantine fault tolerance required in trustless public networks. Organizations can select consensus protocols that align with their specific business requirements, whether that's maximizing transaction throughput, minimizing latency, or optimizing energy consumption.
A group or organization runs these permissioned blockchains. A protocol is in place to guarantee the integrity of data and validate the transactions added to the network. The process of adding data to the network has many moving parts that work together to maintain the system's integrity.
Nodes are devices that run the network software and can create, validate, and store blockchain data. The network software is either licensed by a software company or built by the controlling entity. The private blockchain is made up of a network of nodes that work in coordination to maintain the distributed ledger.
The controlling organization or group runs this network and maintains oversight of all operations. The organization running the private blockchain can delegate validator nodes to participants to allow them to validate transactions before they are recorded on the ledger. Other participants can get nodes, but they cannot validate transactions. Notably, the nodes hosted by the controlling entity have a record of the entire ledger. Meanwhile, participant nodes only hold parts of the ledger they can access.
Most private blockchains have a software application that connects participants to the network and allows them to make transactions. This application layer provides a user-friendly interface that abstracts the complexity of blockchain technology, making it accessible to users who may not have technical expertise in distributed systems.
Consensus mechanisms in blockchain allow the network to verify transactions and reach an agreement on the state of the ledger. Every private blockchain has a consensus mechanism that meets the participants' needs and the controlling entity's requirements.
In a private blockchain, the authority of the controlling organization alone is not enough. A consensus mechanism is necessary to legitimize the data added to the ledger and ensure that all participants agree on the current state of the blockchain. This creates a system of checks and balances even within a permissioned environment.
Consensus mechanisms enhance private blockchains' privacy and security by restricting who can approve transactions and add data to the blockchain. The organization running the blockchain pre-selects validators to participate in the consensus, ensuring sensitive participant data is protected during validation.
Using pre-selected validators who are known to the organization ensures accountability. The transactions are grouped in blocks, validated by pre-selected nodes that find the hash function, and added to the blockchain. Examples of private blockchain consensus mechanisms include Proof-of-Authority, Federated Byzantine Agreement, Proof-of-Importance, and Proof-of-Elapsed-Time. Each of these mechanisms offers different trade-offs between speed, security, and decentralization.
Private blockchains limit participants to those verified and authorized by the controlling organization. Because every participant is approved by the running organization, they have a higher degree of data privacy than other blockchain networks. As a consequence, the chances of malicious actors on the network are significantly reduced.
The controlling organization also restricts what data participants can access. Enforcing access rights on a ledger carrying sensitive information ensures that user privacy is upheld and only trusted participants can view the data. This selective visibility is crucial for industries dealing with confidential information such as financial records, medical data, or proprietary business intelligence.
Additionally, private blockchains can implement encryption at multiple levels - encrypting data at rest, in transit, and even on the blockchain itself. This multi-layered approach to security ensures that even if unauthorized access occurs, the data remains protected through cryptographic safeguards.
Private blockchains are customizable distributed ledgers that prioritize privacy and security while offering several operational benefits.
Private blockchains offer selective access rights to the network, and not all participants can view the full ledger. The controlling organization has the authority to limit the data participants can access and protect user data from the public. It verifies all the participants' identities, which increases the level of trust in the network.
This level of data control is essential for organizations that must comply with data protection regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA. By controlling who can access what information, organizations can ensure they meet their legal obligations while still benefiting from blockchain technology's transparency and immutability features.
Private blockchains have fewer participants and are more efficient than public blockchains. Their controlled nature and limited nodes facilitate higher throughput and faster transactions. Fewer nodes ensure that private blockchains can reach consensus fast and implement necessary changes, improving scalability.
The scalability advantage becomes particularly evident when comparing transaction speeds. While public blockchains may process a limited number of transactions per second, private blockchains can handle thousands or even tens of thousands of transactions per second, making them suitable for high-volume enterprise applications.
Private blockchains have lower transaction fees as they have limited participants and high throughput. Permissioned blockchains don't increase transaction fees based on demand. Instead, they maintain a low and predictable price point. The network is also more cost-effective; it can be operated with few resources and can use existing infrastructure.
This cost predictability is crucial for enterprise budgeting and financial planning. Unlike public blockchains where transaction costs can fluctuate wildly based on network congestion, private blockchains offer stable operational costs that organizations can forecast and manage effectively.
Private blockchains have the potential to iron out inefficiencies in many traditional industries. A shared ledger can streamline information processing and communication between shareholders. The blockchain's controlled nature ensures that participants are verified and receive restricted access to data.
Private blockchains' unique features offer a transformative approach to recording and managing data for business-to-business and business-to-consumer enterprises.
Permissioned blockchains are intrinsically private. Only authorized participants can access the ledger. The closed system ensures that sensitive business information is kept secure and participants are vetted before gaining access to the network. Private networks can be customized to the business's needs and can be tailored to fit the enterprises' requirements and goals. Enterprises can operate private blockchain using existing infrastructure, which minimizes disruption during adoption.
Enterprises are leveraging private blockchains for various applications including digital identity management, intellectual property protection, internal audit trails, and inter-company settlements. The ability to create a single source of truth that multiple parties can trust without relying on a central intermediary is revolutionizing how businesses collaborate and share information.
Private blockchains can revolutionize supply chain management by providing security, accountability, and transparency of data during the movement of goods from production to consumer.
Permissioned blockchains can streamline the logistics process and offer data validation and transparency through a shared ledger with records of all transactions. This offers a single source of truth for all stakeholders in the network, increasing trust among participants.
In practical terms, this means that manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and even consumers can track a product's journey from raw materials to final delivery. Each step in the supply chain can be recorded on the blockchain, creating an immutable audit trail that helps prevent counterfeiting, ensures quality control, and improves inventory management.
Private blockchain networks are reshaping the banking industry's technology infrastructure by reducing reliance on third parties and lowering transaction costs. Blockchain technology can streamline cross-border transactions and automate complex commands through smart contracts. The sector is experiencing significant growth, and the number of B2B cross-border transactions finalized on blockchain is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years. Recent estimates suggest that B2B cross-border transactions on blockchain will reach hundreds of millions and make up a significant portion of total B2B international payments.
The shared ledger can create accountability and promote transparency between all parties involved in financial agreements. Financial institutions are using private blockchains for securities settlement, trade finance, syndicated lending, and regulatory reporting. The technology's ability to provide real-time settlement while maintaining privacy and compliance with financial regulations makes it particularly attractive to the banking sector.
The healthcare industry deals with sensitive medical data and a large number of patient records that need to be stored securely and recorded accurately. Private blockchains' privacy and security features can be customized to store immutable records and give authorized parties selective access to patient information.
The distributed ledger can facilitate more collaborative patient care by providing medical practitioners with updated medical records that are chronologically organized. This ensures that healthcare providers have access to complete and accurate patient histories, reducing medical errors and improving treatment outcomes.
Another nascent yet fast-expanding application area, the blockchain in healthcare market is expected to grow at a significant compound annual growth rate over the next decade. Healthcare organizations are exploring blockchain for applications including patient data management, pharmaceutical supply chain tracking, clinical trial data management, and medical credential verification.
While private blockchains offer numerous advantages, they also come with some drawbacks that organizations must consider.
Private blockchains are centralized networks that are under the control of an organization or group. The full ledger is only accessible to the controlling organization, and in some cases, the central body can alter or delete data on the blockchain. Blockchain centralization can create concerns about data integrity.
This centralization somewhat contradicts the original blockchain philosophy of decentralization and trustlessness. Critics argue that if a single entity controls the network, it defeats the purpose of using blockchain technology at all, as traditional databases could serve similar functions. However, proponents counter that the immutability and cryptographic security of blockchain still provide value even in a permissioned environment.
Integrating private blockchains into existing industries is not a clear-cut process since the technology faces regulatory ambiguity and a lack of standardization. Blockchain technology has no clear regulatory frameworks and no standardized protocol. Most projects use standalone consensus and programming language for their network, which reduces blockchain interoperability.
Private blockchains can also be incompatible with legacy systems. Organizations often face significant technical challenges when attempting to integrate blockchain technology with their existing IT infrastructure. This may require substantial investment in new hardware, software, and training, as well as careful planning to ensure business continuity during the transition period.
Participants in a private blockchain have limited access to data on the network. The controlling organization selects who can add information to the blockchain and restricts participants from viewing the full ledger.
While this limited transparency is by design and serves important privacy and security purposes, it can also create trust issues among participants who cannot independently verify all transactions on the network. This requires participants to place significant trust in the controlling organization, which may not always align with the trustless ideal of blockchain technology.
The biggest differences between these two network types are related to decentralization, privacy, accessibility, and efficiency. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations deciding which type of blockchain best suits their needs.
Public blockchains are decentralized with no central authority, and nodes are responsible for maintaining the network. Meanwhile, private blockchains are partially decentralized, with a central authority managing the network. Public blockchains are at risk for a 51% attack, while private network centralization eliminates that risk.
Private blockchains focus on maintaining participant privacy and protecting data from unauthorized actors, whereas public blockchains are fully transparent, and the information on the ledger is open to everyone. Public blockchains are accessible to anyone, while private blockchains are only accessible to verified and authorized participants. Permissioned blockchains have limited participants, which increases transaction throughput and speed, whereas public blockchains have millions of participants, which slows down consensus and transaction speed.
Additionally, governance models differ significantly between the two types. Public blockchains typically require community consensus for protocol changes, which can be a slow and contentious process. Private blockchains allow the controlling organization to implement changes more quickly, providing greater agility but less democratic governance.
Private blockchain networks have the potential to reshape industries and revolutionize how companies manage and record data. The ledger's features of transparency, security and privacy can fix flaws across finance, supply chain management, and healthcare. The technology is flexible and still evolving, leaving room to eventually overcome its challenges and limitations.
Leveraging permissioned blockchain technology can give enterprises a competitive edge by gaining the trust of stakeholders and increasing company revenue. As the technology matures and standards emerge, we can expect to see wider adoption across various sectors. Organizations that successfully implement private blockchain solutions today are positioning themselves to be leaders in their industries tomorrow.
The future of private blockchains likely involves greater interoperability between different networks, clearer regulatory frameworks, and hybrid models that combine the best features of both private and public blockchains. As these developments unfold, private blockchains will continue to evolve and adapt to meet the changing needs of enterprises and industries worldwide.
A private blockchain is controlled by a single entity with restricted access. Unlike public blockchains that allow anyone to participate and view, private blockchains require permission and are typically centralized for specific use cases.
Advantages: fast transaction speed, low costs, high privacy, and easier access control. Disadvantages: limited scalability, fewer nodes, centralization risks, and reduced decentralization benefits compared to public blockchains.
Private blockchains are used in supply chain management, financial transactions, and internal data sharing. Enterprises adopt private blockchains to ensure transaction security, data privacy, regulatory compliance, and controlled access to sensitive information.
Private blockchains ensure security through restricted access controls, permissioning verified participants only. Encryption protects transaction confidentiality, while owners manage data access and can modify records as needed, preventing unauthorized data breaches effectively.
Private blockchains use role-based access control and permission lists to restrict data access and operations to authorized users only. Access control servers manage blockchain participation, ensuring only verified participants can join and interact with the network.
Private blockchains are controlled by a single organization and restricted to internal users, prioritizing speed. Consortium blockchains are governed by multiple organizations, allowing selected external participants, offering higher throughput and decentralization.











