Can the WLFI Address be freely pumped? Is it still considered a Blockchain project? Can centralized assets be effectively protected? Is there long-term value in holding such projects?


The WLFI project party unilaterally froze 2.9 billion tokens (worth over $100 million) from Sun Yuchen's Address, exposing the "blacklist" authority reserved in its smart contract. This operation does not require community voting and can deprive users of asset control solely based on centralized team decisions, completely contradicting the Blockchain principle of "private key is sovereignty." Although WLFI operates on the Ethereum Blockchain, its mandatory KYC, governance tokens with no economic rights, and the team's reserved veto power are essentially centralized control disguised as compliance. When the project party can arbitrarily determine market manipulation and freeze the assets of top investors, so-called "decentralized finance" has become a satire.
#内容挖矿,赚丰厚返佣
WLFI-0.15%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)