"Negotiation" is actually "ultimatum," and the next step is military action:

1. All Iranians and all channels deny any contact with the United States and there is no "consensus" whatsoever.
2. The United States has only presented "negotiation terms" to Iran through intermediary channels (several second-tier countries intentionally mediating).
3. The U.S. "negotiation terms" are not new; their "15-point plan" was basically proposed before this war, and beyond demanding Iran relinquish all nuclear capabilities and proxy networks, they added further demands (such as restricting Iran's missile capabilities and ensuring permanent navigation through the Strait).
4. The United States is proposing "victor" conditions, while Iran is the "defeated" party, required to sign a humiliating surrender agreement that permanently limits its capabilities.
5. Iran has explicitly rejected the U.S. conditions and has repeatedly clarified its own conditions. These are basically the same as those proposed in mid-March, demanding compensation from the U.S. and Israel, recognition of the Iranian government’s status, mutual non-aggression, the lifting of sanctions, closure of U.S. military bases, and withdrawal from the Middle East, including Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz.
6. Iran is proposing "victor" conditions, while the U.S. is the "defeated" party.
7. There is no overlap whatsoever between the U.S. and Iran's "negotiation conditions"; they are completely opposite, 180 degrees apart.
8. Israel has never been part of the negotiations: the country refuses to negotiate, does not participate in negotiations, does not comment on negotiations, and only reaffirms its war objectives, maintaining its offensive against Iran (including bombing and assassinations). The U.S. has also participated in bombing operations.