Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#AnthropicvsOpenAIHeatsUp For the first time in a decade, the leadership in the AI industry has shifted. In April 2026, Anthropic announced it had surpassed OpenAI in annualized revenue. That same week, OpenAI raised its valuation to $852 billion with a new funding round of $122 billion. Amidst this financial duel, the Pentagon placed Anthropic on its "supply chain risk" list—the first time in American history that a domestic company had been included in such a list. Three fronts—revenue, platform control, and government relations—heated simultaneously.
1. The Anatomy of the Revenue Race
At the beginning of 2025, OpenAI started the race with $6 billion against Anthropic with $1 billion. By the beginning of 2026, the gap had widened to $20 billion against $9 billion. In April, the situation reversed, with Anthropic reporting $30 billion in ARR while OpenAI remained at $24 billion. According to analysts, the difference stems not from accounting methods, but from usage patterns. Coding assistants consume 10 times more tokens than chat, and Claude Code has exploded in this area. OpenAI therefore shut down its consumer application Sora and shifted resources to Codex.
2. Platform Wars
April 4: Anthropic blocked the popular open-source interface OpenClaw from using Claude subscriptions. The reason given was that the subscriptions were not designed for third-party use and were now pay-as-you-go.
April 2: OpenAI launched pay-as-you-go pricing for Codex, gaining the upper hand two days earlier.
That same week, OpenAI acquired TBPN, a reference channel for the developer community, and hired Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw.
On the Anthropic front, the fact that 512,000 lines of Claude Code source were open on npm for three hours raised security concerns.
3. Pentagon and ethical breach
At the end of February, Anthropic rejected a $200 million Pentagon contract for two red lines: no mass local surveillance, no fully autonomous weapons. The response was harsh. President Trump instructed all federal agencies to halt Anthropic products. That same evening, OpenAI signed an agreement with the Pentagon for classified systems. On April 8, an appeals court rejected Anthropic's request for a stay of execution, citing national security.
4. Regulatory Front
Illinois SB 3444 proposes exemption from mass harm lawsuits for frontier AI companies that publish security reports. OpenAI supports the bill, Anthropic opposes it. According to Anthropic, the law prioritizes procedural compliance over technical security.
April 2026, #AnthropicvsOpenAIHeatsUp changed the nature of the competition. Now the question is not "which model is better," but "which business model is more scalable."
Token volume is the new revenue indicator. The growth of Claude Code and Codex directly impacts the demand for GPUs and decentralized computing.
The Washington risk must be priced in. Anthropic's blacklist status favors OpenAI in the US enterprise market in the short term, but in the long term, exemption laws could set a precedent for the entire sector.
The liquidity window is narrowing. The mega IPOs planned for the second half of 2026 by SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic may postpone funding for smaller AI and Web3 projects until 2027.
This battle will be won more through accounting, contract language, and regulatory choices than through model quality. We will continue to monitor developments.
This is not investment advice.