Before President Trump officially nominates Kevin Warsh to serve as Federal Reserve Chair, 10x Research founder Markus Thielen has warned that Warsh, who has historically taken a hawkish stance, may exert pressure on risk assets such as cryptocurrencies if he takes the helm of the Fed.
(Background: Will Warsh push funds into Bitcoin? After Trump’s nomination, gold fell below $5,000, and BTC briefly rebounded to $83,700.)
(Additional context: Trump’s favored Fed Chair Kevin Warsh on Bitcoin: It’s not a dollar substitute, but a “supervisor” of monetary policy.)
Table of Contents
- Warsh’s nomination raises market concerns
- Rising real interest rates suppress risk assets
- Warsh’s past positions deepen market worries
- Potential conflicts between hawkish stance and Trump’s policy direction
President Trump has officially nominated Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve Chair, with Powell’s term ending in May. The nomination was announced on January 30, 2026, but Warsh still needs Senate confirmation before taking office.
However, even before the official announcement, cryptocurrency research firm 10x Research founder Markus Thielen expressed strong concerns about Warsh potentially leading the Fed, believing his past hawkish monetary policy stance would be bearish for Bitcoin and other crypto assets.
Warsh’s nomination raises market concerns
Thielen pointed out that the market generally views Warsh’s appointment as a negative signal for Bitcoin. The reason is that Warsh has long emphasized monetary discipline, maintaining high real interest rates, and reducing market liquidity. Under this framework, cryptocurrencies are not seen as effective hedges against currency devaluation but rather as speculative excess products in a loose monetary environment. When tightening policies return, these assets are often the first to be impacted.
Rising real interest rates suppress risk assets
Thielen further explained that higher real interest rates (the actual borrowing cost after inflation) increase the real burden of debt. For businesses and investors, this means reduced attractiveness of risk investments, with high-volatility assets like Bitcoin typically the first to suffer.
Historically, whenever real interest rates rise significantly, risk appetite declines, and crypto markets often face substantial selling pressure.
Warsh’s past positions deepen market worries
Thielen specifically mentioned Warsh’s stance during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis, when he repeatedly emphasized inflation risks even as the economy was nearing deflation. For example, in September 2008, after Lehman Brothers collapsed, Warsh expressed reluctance to abandon concerns about inflation; in the following year, with inflation at only 0.8% and unemployment at 9%, he remained more worried about inflation rising than falling. Many observers believe this hawkish attitude could prolong the crisis, increase unemployment, and amplify deflationary pressures in the 2010s.
Thielen summarized that if Warsh leads the Fed, his policy orientation could result in a slower economic recovery and higher unemployment risks, posing a significant challenge for crypto markets that rely on liquidity support.
Potential conflicts between hawkish stance and Trump’s policy direction
Interestingly, Warsh’s hawkish stance contrasts sharply with Trump’s consistent advocacy for rapid rate cuts. Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for maintaining high interest rates that drag on the economy and has even called for rates to be lowered to around 1%. Thielen believes that markets have already priced in the possibility that Warsh, if appointed, may find it difficult to fully align with Trump’s dovish expectations, further fueling investor doubts about the outlook for crypto assets.
Although the Federal Reserve Chair cannot unilaterally set interest rates (requiring collective voting by the Board of Governors), Warsh’s historical positions could influence market sentiment in the short term, boosting the dollar and suppressing risk assets. The confirmation process in the Senate and Warsh’s actual policy stance may become key variables in determining the future direction of the crypto market.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Goldman Sachs Warns of US Stocks Selling Pressure, What's For BTC Price?
Goldman Sachs warns of a potential $80 billion sell-off in US stocks, which could negatively impact BTC prices. Meanwhile, gold and silver prices have eased, prompting investor interest despite economic uncertainties.
TheNewsCrypto3h ago
Is Bitcoin more like tech stocks rather than digital gold? Grayscale reveals the true underlying factors behind it
Despite continuous positive signals such as ETF approvals and institutional adoption, since mid-last year, funds in the crypto market have been steadily flowing out, and Bitcoin's price performance has been more similar to high-growth software stocks in the US rather than traditional safe-haven assets. Grayscale's latest research indicates that the correlation between Bitcoin and the US software sector has significantly increased, showing that its trading logic is more aligned with growth assets.
Data shows that from the beginning of 2024 to now, Bitcoin and US software stocks have moved in highly synchronized patterns. During recent sell-offs, both have fluctuated almost in the same direction, indicating that this round of decline is more due to a broad de-risking of growth assets rather than issues specific to the crypto industry itself. Fund flows also confirm this: US investors led the recent sell-off, with related Bitcoin ETPs experiencing approximately $318 million in net outflows since early February, further suppressing prices.
GateNewsBot4h ago
Non-farm payrolls may unexpectedly increase by only 70,000! White House: It's not an employment recession, but a productivity revolution
White House Chief Kevin Hassett states that future employment may decline due to slower labor force growth and increased productivity. From November to December, the average non-farm payroll increase was 53,000 per month, far below the pre-pandemic average of 183,000. He emphasizes that the economy is not weak, and tighter immigration combined with rising productivity allows growth even with limited labor force. The January forecast is an increase of 70,000. Powell says that demand and supply are declining simultaneously, making it very difficult to interpret at present.
MarketWhisper11h ago
Trump TACO Trading Bubble Bursts! Bitcoin Once Dropped to $60,000, Federal Reserve Warnings Ring Out
Federal Reserve Board Governor Christopher Waller stated on February 9 that recent sharp fluctuations in Bitcoin indicate that the TACO trading frenzy that occurred when the Trump administration took office has subsided. Bitcoin fell to $60,000 on February 5, nearly erasing the gains since Trump's election. Waller pointed out that the surge in volatility is driven by regulatory uncertainty and institutional risk management, with companies entering through ETFs being forced to close positions.
MarketWhisper14h ago
Bitcoin's year-end target price is 150,000! Bernstein: No large-scale leverage collapse has occurred
Research firm Bernstein maintains its Bitcoin forecast of $150,000 by the end of 2026, stating that the current dip is the least threatening downturn in trading history. The analyst team pointed out that recent weakness stems from a shift in market sentiment rather than a fundamental collapse, and this sell-off has not seen leverage crashes, exchange failures, or systemic vulnerabilities. Institutional support remains solid, with participation from spot ETFs, corporate finance, and mainstream asset management firms unchanged. Miner debt structures are healthy enough to withstand a prolonged downturn.
MarketWhisper15h ago
Why did Bitcoin drop today? Long-term holders sold 245,000 BTC, and the rate cut policy before non-farm payrolls remains uncertain.
Bitcoin reported $70,000 on February 10, and remains in a sluggish trend. Long-term holders' net positions decreased by 245,000 BTC, but the total supply increased from 13.63 million to 13.81 million, indicating reallocation. On February 6, 66,940 BTC flowed into accumulated addresses, reaching the weekly maximum, indicating whale accumulation. The Sharpe ratio of -10 hits a new low, consistent with the late bear market.
MarketWhisper15h ago