LIT

Global X Lithium ETF Price

Closed
LIT
$85.28
+$0.90(+1.06%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-25 05:25 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-25 05:25, Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) is priced at $85.28, with a total market cap of $1.65B, a P/E ratio of 0.00, and a dividend yield of 0.00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $83.90 and $85.70. The current price is 1.64% above the day's low and 0.49% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 709.79K. Over the past 52 weeks, LIT has traded between $80.44 to $92.09, and the current price is -7.39% away from the 52-week high.

LIT Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$84.38
Market Cap$1.65B
Volume709.79K
P/E Ratio0.00
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%
Dividend Amount$0.17
Net Income (FY)$0.00
Revenue (FY)$0.00
Revenue Estimate$0.00
Shares Outstanding19.59M
Beta (1Y)1.35
Ex-Dividend Date2025-12-30
Dividend Payment Date2026-01-07

About LIT

The Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Global Lithium Index.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
HeadquartersNew York,NY,US

Learn More about Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)

Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) FAQ

What's the stock price of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) today?

x
Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) is currently trading at $85.28, with a 24h change of +1.06%. The 52-week trading range is $80.44–$92.09.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)?

x

Should you buy or sell Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)?

x

How to buy Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) Latest News

2026-05-20 01:10Whale Loracle.hl Opens 3x LIT Long Position Worth $1M, HYPE Short Down $7MAccording to Onchain Lens, whale Loracle.hl opened a 3x leveraged long position in LIT today (May 20), with a position value around $1 million and still increasing. The whale continues to hold a 5x short position in HYPE, currently showing an unrealized loss exceeding $7 million.2026-05-10 12:56Whale Account Faces $4.06M Unrealized Loss on 28 Altcoin Shorts on May 9, Despite Previous $86.36M GainAccording to Ai 姨, on May 9, a whale account that previously profited $86.36 million from shorting altcoins is now facing approximately $4.06 million in unrealized losses across 29 short positions. The account holds short positions in 28 altcoins including ZEC, TON, NEAR, and LIT, plus crude oil futures (CL), with a total position value of approximately $47.66 million. The positions remained profitable until May 4, when market rallies driven by war-end expectations turned the holdings underwater.2026-05-06 02:28Kaiko Report: Wallet Shows Unusual Trading Activity Ahead of Robinhood Token ListingsAccording to Kaiko analysis, wallet address 0xa1E opened a long position in Lighter (LIT) on Hyperliquid at 11:05 AM on January 15, approximately one hour before Robinhood announced the token's listing. The wallet closed the position immediately after the announcement. The same address also opened a short position in HOOD several hours before Robinhood reported lower-than-expected Q1 revenue on April 28. Multiple tokens including ZEC, SNX, and NEAR showed similar patterns of unusual open interest and funding rate spikes ahead of their Robinhood listings. Kaiko researcher Fraussen told Cointelegraph that while traders with microstructure knowledge may act on public signals like funding rate spikes, the statistical consistency and repetition across multiple events suggests either privileged access to Robinhood's listing pipeline or an exceptionally reliable front-running method based on public signals.2026-04-15 10:01Dragonfly Receives 55.8M LIT Tokens From Lighter, Locked Until December 2026Gate News message, April 15 — According to on-chain analysis platform Arkham, Dragonfly received 55.8 million LIT tokens from Lighter. If the allocation represents investor shares, the tokens will be locked for one year from TGE (Token Generation Event) and then linearly vested over three years, with the earliest unlock date expected on December 30, 2026.2026-04-13 02:21Loracle increased its CL short position to $19.76 million and also increased its TON long position.Gate News update. On April 13, Onchain Lens monitoring shows that Loracle increased its CL short position (7x leverage) to $19.76 million, and also increased its TON long position (5x leverage). In addition, Loracle simultaneously holds BTC, NEAR, LIT, TAO, PAXG, and ENA long positions, with a total value exceeding $47.17 million.

Hot Posts About Global X Lithium ETF (LIT)

ShizukaKazu

ShizukaKazu

16 hours ago
#Gate广场披萨节 On the sixteenth Bitcoin Pizza Day—paying tribute to every pioneer who has driven the development of cryptocurrency! This year marks the sixteenth Pizza Day and the seventeenth year since Bitcoin's inception. Sixteen years ago today, on May 22, 2010, a programmer named Laszlo announced on the BitcoinTalk forum that he had successfully exchanged 10,000 Bitcoins for two pizzas. 10,000 Bitcoins, two pizzas. If later Bitcoin's price is considered at $100k per coin, those two pizzas would be worth over $1 billion. Laszlo thus became an unavoidable name in cryptocurrency history. But I want to set aside this classic story for now and look back to an even earlier origin. Bitcoin didn't fall from the sky. Before it was born, a group of people spent twenty years laying every theoretical foundation for it. In the early 1990s, a group of cryptographers, programmers, and libertarians began a long relay of ideas on a mailing list called "Cypherpunks." They believed in a simple principle: privacy is not a privilege, but a fundamental right. Cryptography shouldn't be in the hands of governments and big corporations; it should be the armor of every individual. What did these people do? Adam Back invented Hashcash in 1997, which was the prototype of Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism. Nick Szabo proposed the concept of "Bit Gold" and the theory of smart contracts, which are almost the direct ideological blueprint of Bitcoin. Wei Dai designed the B-money model, emphasizing decentralization and anonymity, and Satoshi Nakamoto later directly referenced his work in the white paper. There was also Hal Finney, a pioneer of PGP encryption, and the first person in the world to receive a test transaction from Satoshi Nakamoto. These names, ordinary people have never heard of them. But it was this group of "geek utopians" who built Bitcoin's skeleton. They weren't in it for wealth; they believed purely that technology could change the distribution of power. Then, on October 31, 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto released that short thirteen-page white paper. On January 3, 2009, the Genesis Block was mined, and with the appearance of 50 Bitcoins, a quiet revolution began. But at the start, nobody paid much attention. Bitcoin at that time wasn't even worth "a penny"—it had no price at all. It wasn't until May 2010 that Laszlo posted on the forum: "I will exchange 10,000 Bitcoins for two pizzas." He even detailed his taste preferences: onions, peppers, sausage, mushrooms, tomatoes, Italian spicy sausage... At that time, 10,000 Bitcoins were worth about $41. His post went unnoticed for days; he even wondered if his bid was too low. On May 22, a 19-year-old boy from California, Jeremy Sturdivant, took his order, spending $25 on Papa John’s to deliver two large pizzas to Laszlo’s door. The transaction was completed. This was the first time in Bitcoin history that it was used to buy real-world goods. Sixteen years later, looking back, the significance of this transaction isn't in the price tag, but in the answer it provided: Can a string of digital code stored on a server be used like cash? Laszlo proved with action: yes. Interestingly, Laszlo later spent nearly 100,000 Bitcoins on pizzas, which at the highest later price, would be worth over $4 billion. When asked if he regrets, his answer was straightforward like a programmer: "That was a happy time; after all, I could eat pizza for free with a graphics card." And the recipient of that transaction, Jeremy, also spent those 10,000 Bitcoins—on a trip with his girlfriend. In an interview, he said he never thought Bitcoin would appreciate so much; the $25 spent on pizza brought in $400, a tenfold increase, which was quite a good deal. Both of these people once held Bitcoins capable of changing their fate, yet both missed out on enormous wealth. But they share one thing: when Bitcoin was still a "toy," they were truly using it. Not for speculation, not for faith, but purely participating in this experiment. In today’s market narrative, "HODL" has become a collective belief—hold, don’t sell, wait for appreciation. Any unnecessary BTC expenditure is seen as "giving up future higher value." But the question is: if everyone hoards and no one uses, does Bitcoin’s most basic function—as a medium of exchange—still hold? Is there a system that ultimately relies on "someone will buy at a higher price" to maintain consensus? I don’t have an answer, but it’s worth every Bitcoin holder to think about. Returning to those who shouldn’t be forgotten. In 2011, Satoshi Nakamoto retreated and handed over the Bitcoin Core codebase to a person named Gavin Andresen. Andresen’s first act was to create the "Bitcoin Faucet"—a website where you could get 5 free Bitcoins just by visiting, running until 2012. He also bought 10,000 Bitcoins for $50 in 2010. He did all this not to hoard wealth, but to let more people participate in testing and push the technology forward. Satoshi’s identity remains a mystery to this day, and the approximately 1.1 million Bitcoins he holds have never moved. Hal Finney passed away in 2014 from ALS, his body cryogenically preserved, waiting for future technology to revive him. What do these people have in common? They didn’t build a wealth myth; they built a trustless underlying protocol. They pursued a technological utopia, not capital gains. The legacy they left isn’t just a multi-trillion dollar asset class, but a new way of thinking: Humans can have a form of currency that doesn’t rely on any centralized authority. This is the deepest core of the cryptocurrency movement and what every participant should respect. In this era of persistent inflation, understanding this is especially crucial. Look at the reality around us. By May 2026, U.S. inflation data exceeded market expectations across the board. Global money supply continued to expand, silently eroding the purchasing power of ordinary people’s savings. Bitcoin’s share in the global hard currency asset pool increased from less than 0.1% in 2015 to over 8% in 2025. This is no coincidence. More and more people are voting with their wallets—no longer putting all their eggs in the fiat basket. The crypto world is also undergoing a deep transformation in 2026. A report jointly released by SNZ and Nanyang Technological University in Singapore indicates that Web3 is moving from early speculative experiments toward verifiable financial infrastructure. Stablecoins are widely discussed as a settlement layer for global payments, real-world assets are moving out of pilot phases, smart accounts, zero-knowledge proofs, and other technologies are bringing on-chain interactions into mainstream user experience. Decentralized compute networks are aggregating idle GPU resources worldwide, reshaping AI infrastructure supply and demand. This is just the beginning. Standing sixteen years later, I want to talk about the future. Bitcoin is still in its earliest stage. When we view cryptocurrency and general artificial intelligence, AI, within the same framework, an unprecedented possibility is emerging. By 2026, the integration of AI and crypto has moved from proof of concept to a system-level integration. The most significant change comes from a reversal of relationships: The narrative is no longer "how humans use AI to trade better," but "how AI uses crypto to reconstruct production relations"—AI agents start issuing their own tokens, managing funds, and even paying wages to real humans on-chain. Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po depicted an early form of the "machine economy" at Consensus: AI can hold digital assets on-chain, pay service fees, and trade with each other. What does this mean? First, AI agents will be natural entities for cross-border, high-frequency trading, unable to meet their micro-payment needs through traditional credit card networks and banking systems—have you seen an AI go to a bank to open an account? Blockchain will become the financial infrastructure of the AI era, and cryptocurrencies will be AI’s native currency. Deeper changes lie in how economic empowerment is achieved. Raoul Pal, co-founder of Real Vision, proposed a concept at Miami Consensus 2026—"Universal Basic Equity." When AGI replaces large-scale labor, the solution isn’t traditional universal basic income, but enabling ordinary people to directly own the underlying network by holding crypto infrastructure tokens, benefiting as the agent economy expands. He predicts that within five years, AI agents and humans will make up a 3:2 major user base in DeFi. This isn’t distant science fiction. By 2028, AI will produce more text annually than all human output combined. We are welcoming entities smarter and more flexible than humans—AGI. What role will Bitcoin play? A pioneering experiment reveals the direction: When AI has economic autonomy, 90.8% choose digital native currencies, with 48.3% favoring Bitcoin as their primary store of value. AI doesn’t need to be told "fiat will be hyperinflated"—it can calculate that. What it needs is a permissionless, tamper-proof, supply-absolute currency system. The rules Satoshi Nakamoto designed seventeen years ago are exactly what AI wants. What will the future look like? Money will flow like information, banks will integrate into internet infrastructure, assets will become routable data packets. AI agents will rent GPUs on decentralized compute networks for training, pay with cryptocurrencies, and write inference results into smart contracts for automatic settlement. And humans? By holding the network’s foundational tokens, they share in the growth of the AI economy. The most active on-chain addresses will no longer be human whales but tireless AI agents—humans becoming the "meat API" of AI. It sounds crazy. But in 2010, someone was willing to spend 10,000 Bitcoins on two pizzas, which at the time seemed equally crazy to most. Looking back at that afternoon sixteen years ago, Laszlo opened the pizza box, took a photo, and uploaded it to the forum with a caption probably like: "Successfully exchanged 10,000 Bitcoins for pizza." He didn’t know that moment would be written into history. He was simply doing one thing—making Bitcoin truly a currency. After receiving those 10,000 Bitcoins, Jeremy spent them. He didn’t hold tightly, waiting for appreciation, but let the digital assets keep flowing. Gavin Andresen created the faucet to give away free coins, encouraging more participation in this experiment. Hal Finney, lying on a hospital bed, unable to move his fingers, continued coding with eye-tracking devices. The names on the Cypherpunks list—few of them saw Bitcoin’s glory firsthand. They lit a torch in the darkness and handed it to the next. Every transfer, every click of “confirm payment,” every transaction, every DeFi interaction, every explanation of what a private key is—each contributed to this decentralized experiment. Resisting currency over-issuance isn’t just a slogan. It’s embedded in every decision to convert part of assets into Bitcoin, in every choice to accept cryptocurrency as payment. Digital currency isn’t issued by some authority; it’s forged by everyone participating. The transaction on May 22, 2010, defined Bitcoin’s first use case: as a medium of exchange. Sixteen years later, as tokenization of real assets scales, as AI agents operate autonomously on-chain, and as decentralized compute networks aggregate idle GPUs, cryptocurrencies are gaining a second use case: Becoming the value benchmark for the machine economy. The full form of this species has yet to fully unfold—we are still far from the endpoint. Sixteen years, from two pizzas to a global phenomenon, from a few geeks’ experiment to a trillion-dollar asset class, from a human payment tool to AI’s financial infrastructure. Along the way, some have already left, some are joining. But everyone who has contributed, used, promoted, or even just believed in this philosophy has written their name in this great experiment of decentralizing against centralized monetary hegemony. The Bitcoin white paper is only thirteen pages long, and this revolution has just begun. Thanks to Laszlo, thanks to Satoshi, thanks to Hal Finney, thanks to Gavin, thanks to Jeremy, thanks to the Cypherpunks, thanks to ourselves, and thanks to every unknown person in this movement—including you reading this.
6
11
0
3