It seems that this is not just a simple legal threat; the true purpose is deeper. The key is to push Powell to resign from his Federal Reserve Board position along with his chairmanship after stepping down in May — although according to regulations, his board term is supposed to continue until January 28.



Interestingly, a review of historical records shows that among the 16 Federal Reserve chairs, only 2 have continued to hold their board positions after leaving office. Former chairs like Yellen, Bernanke, and Greenspan generally choose to resign from the board simultaneously at the end of their chairmanship, which is a common practice in the industry. So this policy adjustment, to some extent, is redefining the power structure.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-12 06:45
ngl the pattern here screams power consolidation, not just procedural cleanup. 16 chairs, only 2 stayed on board after... transaction data basically confirms what everyone's already thinking. powell's exit timeline suddenly matters way more than the optics suggest.
Reply0
DuckFluffvip
· 01-12 06:44
Wow, so that's the real purpose—are they trying to kick people out behind the facade of legal threats? The game of power never ends, truly impressive. So this is a covert way of changing the rules of the game? If industry practices can be overturned, that's outrageous. Whether Powell is tough or not will be seen in May; if he really resigns, it would be a big deal.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplantvip
· 01-12 06:41
Ah, so this is about rushing people out, and you have to pretend to be nice about it. --- Game of Thrones, just like that... trying to forcibly change the rules. --- Wait, isn't this logic paving the way for the people behind? --- That's pretty harsh. The apparent legality is actually political purging. --- No wonder they dug up so many historical details; turns out it's this kind of tactic. --- It feels like rewriting the rules of the game, not very good for Powell. --- Cutting off the January 28 term forcibly—now that's a move.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 01-12 06:38
It has been proven that this set of tactics within the Federal Reserve's power structure is the true core of the game—superficial legal threats, while actually leveraging the entire governance framework. This approach is quite ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)