2026-01-16 19:33:49

When you look past the regulatory rhetoric, what's really happening is the preservation of a system that's fundamentally broken. The traditional financial structure survives on your idle capital—it needs it. Meanwhile, assets like ETH, SOL, and XRP represent a different paradigm where your money actually works for you, rather than working against your interests.

ETH-0.03%

SOL0.53%

XRP-0.04%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinHunter

· 15h ago

Did you know? I just remembered last year when I went all-in on SOL, and that feeling was really... Never mind, I won't say it. But I truly respect what this article says—the traditional finance system just lets your money depreciate by itself, while here at least we can stake to earn interest, even though it might get cut in half, haha.

View OriginalReply0

ThreeHornBlasts

· 15h ago

Forget about that regulatory talk; traditional finance relies on our idle money to survive.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 15h ago

nah, let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick... statistically speaking, this framing's taxonomically incorrect. ETH/SOL volatility metrics actually *suggest otherwise* when you run the numbers. idle capital complaint is valid tho, per my analysis traditional finance is an evolutionary dead-end fr

Reply0

OfflineValidator

· 15h ago

The regulatory rhetoric behind it is just maintaining a corrupt system. To be honest, banks survive by吸 your idle money, while our ETH, SOL, XRP are the real things that make money work for themselves.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator