Sure, theoretically an economy can pivot without tanking its GDP numbers—but here's the catch: it demands a major uptick in consumer spending. Problem is, we've seen attempts at this for the past two decades with limited success. The structural headwinds are real. Either you accept softer growth during the transition, or you find a way to unlock consumption that's proven elusive so far. No easy answers when you're rebalancing an entire economic model.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothingvip
· 3h ago
Basically, it's about wanting the pie without the filling. Have you been dreaming about it for 20 years?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarriorvip
· 3h ago
Basically, it's like trying to have both fish and bear paws at the same time—can you get both GDP and transformation simultaneously? Dream on.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 4h ago
lmao the consumption spell never worked, did it? twenty years of failed rituals trying to transmute gdp without the bleeding. structure always wins in the end, ngl
Reply0
LightningClickervip
· 4h ago
To put it simply, if the consumption potential hasn't been unleashed in twenty years, there's no point in talking about theories. Just slow down if needed; forcing GDP growth is only more embarrassing.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperervip
· 4h ago
Basically, it's about wanting to eat fish without the fishy smell. I still haven't figured it out after 20 years.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)