
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is the central decision-making body for monetary policy within the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FRB). The committee meets eight times per year, setting policy rates and implementing measures such as quantitative easing or tightening. These decisions impact not only the U.S. economy but also have significant effects on global financial markets, including the Bitcoin (BTC) market.

The FOMC is composed of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents. As of this writing, Jerome Powell serves as Fed Chair, and after every meeting, he holds a press conference outlining the economic outlook and policy stance. These briefings are key references for market participants in interpreting future policy direction.
The policy rate is the benchmark overnight lending rate between banks. It directly affects the banking system but also transmits through the broader economy. When rates rise, borrowing costs increase, reducing financing activity by businesses and individuals, and slowing economic activity. Lower rates make borrowing easier, boost liquidity, and support economic expansion.
In investment markets, low interest rates drive investors to seek higher-yielding risk assets such as stocks and cryptocurrencies. High rates push capital toward safer assets like government bonds and dollar deposits. Lower rates usually favor rallies in risk assets like Bitcoin, while higher rates may suppress their performance.
Beyond rate adjustments, the Fed also affects market liquidity through asset purchase programs. Quantitative easing (QE) involves central bank purchases of government bonds or other assets, injecting substantial liquidity to stimulate economic activity. This policy tends to drive up prices of assets including stocks and Bitcoin.
Quantitative tightening (QT), on the other hand, means the Fed reduces its balance sheet and market liquidity. QT puts pressure on risk assets as investable funds decrease. Recent data shows that QT periods are often accompanied by corrections or declines in Bitcoin prices.
Markets often respond in advance to FOMC policy expectations rather than waiting for official implementation. For example, when markets expect continued Fed rate hikes, investors may exit risk assets before any announcement. Similarly, when a rate cut is anticipated, capital may flow into Bitcoin and similar assets before the policy change.
The famous maxim “Don’t fight the Fed” means investors should align with the Fed’s policy direction. This applies to Bitcoin as well. When the Fed adopts tighter policies, Bitcoin typically faces downward pressure; when policy turns accommodative, Bitcoin usually sees upside opportunities.
The FOMC is the primary institution within the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) that sets U.S. monetary policy. It meets about eight times per year to decide changes to the federal funds rate and whether to implement QE or QT. These decisions have ripple effects throughout the global financial system, strongly influencing the cryptocurrency market, including Bitcoin.
FOMC decisions impact Bitcoin through several channels. First, policy rate changes affect risk appetite. Higher rates prompt investors to choose safer assets, while lower rates encourage risk-taking and pursuit of higher returns—benefiting risk assets like Bitcoin.
Second, FOMC statements and the Chair’s press conferences shape market expectations for future policy. Hawkish signals may lead investors to anticipate further hikes and sell risk assets early; dovish signals may prompt investors to buy risk assets in anticipation of rate cuts or slower tightening.
Since 2021, the Fed’s monetary policy has changed dramatically. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed kept rates near zero and implemented large-scale QE to support recovery. This environment was highly favorable for risk assets like Bitcoin, driving strong price gains.
However, with economic recovery and rising inflation, the Fed began signaling tightening in the second half of 2021. By 2022, the Fed officially started raising rates and reduced its balance sheet. This shift put significant pressure on Bitcoin, causing prices to fall sharply from their highs.
For beginners, the following principles are critical:
Hawkish policy (rate hikes/tightening) is usually bearish for Bitcoin: Tight Fed policy reduces liquidity and risk appetite, putting downward pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin.
Dovish policy (rate cuts/easing) is usually bullish for Bitcoin: Easier Fed policy increases liquidity and risk appetite, benefiting risk assets.
The market reacts in advance: Investors adjust positions early based on FOMC statements and the Chair’s remarks. Understanding FOMC signals is more important than the actual rate decision itself.
Bitcoin is increasingly seen as a macroeconomic asset, with price movements more closely linked to broader financial markets. Bitcoin is now affected as much by macro conditions and monetary policy as it is by internal crypto market factors.
Bitcoin investors must follow FOMC decisions and Fed policy stance closely. Understanding these macro factors helps investors better judge market trends and build sound investment strategies.
The following table summarizes major FOMC meetings, Fed policy stance, and Bitcoin price reactions from 2021 to 2025. These historical data highlight how monetary policy changes affect the Bitcoin market.
| Meeting Date | Rate Decision | Fed Stance | Bitcoin Short-Term Reaction (24 Hours) | Subsequent Trend (About 1 Week) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2021 | Held at 0% (early hike expected) | Slightly hawkish (inflation concerns) | Down ~5% (stronger USD, stocks down) | Continued drop, down ~10% by weekend ($40K → $35K) |
| Nov 3, 2021 | Held at 0% (start tapering asset purchases) | Hawkish (reduce easing) | Sharp 5% drop then stabilized | New all-time high next week (tapering priced in) |
| Dec 15, 2021 | Held at 0% (accelerated tapering) | Hawkish (three hikes previewed) | Slight rise then quick reversal | Weakened, ended year below $50K |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Hike of 0.25% (start of hikes) | Neutral/dovish (cautious) | Nearly flat (no major swing) | Gradual rebound, up ~15% in two weeks |
| May 4, 2022 | Hike of 0.50% | Hawkish (start QT) | Brief 5% surge (market reassured after denying 0.75%) | Sharp drop, down >20% in a week (external factors) |
| Jun 15, 2022 | Hike of 0.75% (largest in 28 years) | Strongly hawkish (soaring inflation) | Already priced in, slight rise (<1%) | Sideways, held near $20K |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Hike of 0.75% (another in a row) | Slightly dovish (near neutral rate) | Risk appetite returned, sharp rise (+5.7% week) | Continued rally, $25K → near $30K |
| Nov 2, 2022 | Hike of 0.75% (fourth consecutive) | Maintained hawkish (“too soon to pause”) | Down 5% ($20.5K → $19.5K) | Accelerated drop, FTX event next week pushed it to $15K range |
| Dec 14, 2022 | Hike of 0.50% (slower pace) | Continued hawkish (further tightening) | Almost no reaction (small moves near $17K) | Sideways, held $16.5K–$17K by year-end |
| Feb 1, 2023 | Hike of 0.25% (slower pace) | Neutral (data-dependent) | Up (+2% after “deflation started” remark) | Continued rally, up 4% in a week (bullish sentiment) |
| Mar 22, 2023 | Hike of 0.25% (extra hike) | Dovish (hinting pause) | Slight drop (<2%, brief selling) | Turned higher, +10% (buying after bank crisis eased) |
| May 3, 2023 | Hike of 0.25% (end of hikes) | Dovish (denied rate cuts) | Minor volatility (<3%) | Sideways, held near $28K |
| Jun 14, 2023 | No change (pause hikes) | Hawkish tone (possible further hike) | No major swing (low market attention) | Sharp rally on ETF news (not policy-related) |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Hike of 0.25% (last hike) | Neutral (data-dependent) | Slight rise (<1%) | Modest increase (+2%), then stable |
| Sep 18, 2024 | Rate cut of 0.50% (start cuts) | Dovish (easing cycle) | Sharp rally (>5%), buying surge as easing begins | Continued rally, up >8% in a week, accelerated bull market |
The table highlights several trends:
Policy expectations matter more than actual decisions: Markets often price in FOMC moves ahead. For example, the 0.75% hike in June 2022 was the biggest in 28 years, but Bitcoin’s reaction was muted because it was anticipated.
Hawkish stances are usually bearish for Bitcoin: Late 2021 through 2022, persistent hawkish signals drove Bitcoin sharply down from its highs, bottoming near $15K.
Strong market response to policy shifts: After the Fed started cutting rates in September 2024, Bitcoin rebounded sharply, showing a positive reaction to easing.
External events can amplify or offset policy impacts: Major events like the FTX collapse in November 2022 and the banking crisis in March 2023 had bigger effects on Bitcoin than FOMC decisions alone.
In 2020–2021, the Fed kept rates at 0% and implemented massive QE to offset the COVID-19 shock, injecting abundant liquidity. This environment was highly favorable for Bitcoin’s rally, pushing prices sharply higher.
But as the economy recovered and inflation rose, things changed. In H2 2021, the U.S. CPI surged to a 30-year high. The Fed started signaling tightening to address inflation.
Bitcoin hit its all-time high of ~$69,000 on November 8, 2021—right as the Fed was clearly turning hawkish. This reaffirms Wall Street’s rule: “Don’t fight the Fed.” When the Fed shifts, markets react quickly.
At the November 2–3, 2021 FOMC, the Fed announced the start of tapering asset purchases. Bitcoin dropped about 5% in 24 hours but found support near $60K, showing the market had largely priced in the policy change.
At the December 15, 2021 meeting, the Fed accelerated tapering and previewed multiple hikes for 2022. By then, Bitcoin had already fallen more than 30% from its peak, with risk aversion rising.
Notably, markets adjusted before the Fed formally announced the shift. Even when tightening risks were mostly priced in by mid-December, the announcement still triggered a brief relief rally. Markets respond to policy expectations in advance, not only to official implementation.
Bitcoin and Ethereum peaked in early November 2021—weeks before the Fed actually hiked rates. Market participants adjust positions based on expectations, not just actual policy. For investors, reading Fed signals is more important than watching rate decisions alone.
In 2022, the Fed began its most aggressive rate hike cycle since the 1980s: seven consecutive hikes, lifting rates from near 0% to ~4.5% by year-end. This rapid tightening created major pressure on risk assets, including Bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s price closely tracked the Fed’s hawkish policy, falling steeply. Its 90-day correlation with the U.S. 10-year real rate reached -0.95, indicating an extremely strong negative relationship. As real rates rose ~170 bps, Bitcoin dropped ~57%.
On March 16, 2022, the Fed’s first hike (0.25%) was fully anticipated, so Bitcoin rebounded briefly. But as markets realized tightening would persist, Bitcoin weakened again.
Subsequent meetings brought even bigger hikes—0.50% in May, then four consecutive 0.75% hikes in June, July, September, and November (the largest in 28 years). Bitcoin plunged from ~$47K at the year’s start to ~$20K in June—a drop of over 50%.
The Fed also began QT, shrinking its balance sheet and withdrawing liquidity. Rapidly rising real rates increased the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin, prompting a shift to higher-yielding products.
In August 2022, Bitcoin’s correlation with the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) reached -0.94. When DXY hit a 20-year high (>110), Bitcoin remained under pressure.
Industry crises like the Luna/UST collapse and FTX bankruptcy further exacerbated declines, with Bitcoin briefly dipping to ~$15K. Macro conditions amplified the panic.
2022 showed that even decentralized assets like Bitcoin are highly affected by macro conditions. Aggressive Fed tightening hit crypto and tech stocks alike. Each FOMC meeting catalyzed volatility.
By year-end, Bitcoin was down ~65% from its 2021 high, reflecting the “end of easy money.” Macro factors quickly became the main market driver.
By 2023, the Fed’s rate was at a restrictive 4.5%–5%, and inflation peaked. The Fed slowed hikes to 0.25% in February and March, signaling a pause. In July, after reaching 5.25%–5.50%, the hike cycle officially ended.
As hikes slowed and stopped, Bitcoin rebounded from its ~$16K November 2022 low to $30K–$35K by mid-2023. The market began to expect rate cuts, fueling early Bitcoin gains.
2023 also saw positive crypto news. BlackRock and other mainstream firms applied for spot Bitcoin ETFs, boosting market confidence. These tailwinds helped Bitcoin more than double off its lows.
However, September’s FOMC meeting signaled a slightly hawkish tone and possible further hikes, causing a short-term Bitcoin correction. But as the market grew confident about imminent rate cuts, Bitcoin resumed its uptrend.
2023 showed that as the Fed’s tightening cycle nears its end, markets position in advance, pushing risk assets higher—even before actual cuts. Rate cut expectations alone can shift sentiment and drive rallies.
In 2024, with inflation falling, the Fed cut rates by 0.50% in September, starting a new easing cycle. Bitcoin jumped over 5% in 24 hours and 8% in a week—an extremely positive market response.
As the Fed continued to cut rates, Bitcoin broke above $100K by year-end, hitting new highs. During easing cycles, Bitcoin tended to consolidate when rates were steady, but each cut triggered another rally.
2024’s market again confirmed Bitcoin’s close correlation with monetary policy cycles. From the 2021 bull peak, through the 2022 bear market, the 2023 recovery, and the new highs in 2024, Bitcoin’s price has tracked Fed policy shifts.
Summing up 2021–2024:
Bitcoin prices typically show a negative correlation with the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY). Understanding this relationship is vital for anticipating price trends.
Bitcoin is priced in dollars. When the dollar strengthens, dollar-denominated assets like Bitcoin become more expensive and demand often falls. When the dollar weakens, Bitcoin’s appeal as an alternative asset grows, and more investors use it to hedge against dollar depreciation.
Dollar strength often reflects tight Fed policy and a robust U.S. economy, making investors favor safe assets. Dollar weakness usually comes with easier policy and greater demand for alternatives.
2022 was a textbook example. The Fed’s aggressive hikes drove DXY to a 20-year high (over 110), while Bitcoin plunged from ~$47K to ~$20K.
Bitcoin’s correlation with DXY hit -0.94 in summer 2022—an extremely strong negative relationship. DXY’s moves largely explained Bitcoin’s price swings.
Bitcoin–DXY Correlation (2022)
| Period | Correlation | Market Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-2022 | -0.94 | DXY at 20-year high, Bitcoin dropped sharply |
| FTX bankruptcy period | Briefly positive | Panic selling caused all assets to fall together |
| End-2022 | Negative again | Normal correlation resumed as markets calmed |
During extreme events like FTX’s collapse, this negative correlation may temporarily break down, as investors sell everything for cash. But the relationship returns as the market stabilizes.
Long-term data confirms the negative correlation. When DXY falls more than 2% in a week or month, Bitcoin is 94% likely to rise over the next 90 days. A weaker dollar almost always supports Bitcoin rallies.
Conversely, a rapidly rising dollar usually pressures Bitcoin. In 2022, as DXY rose from 95 to above 110, Bitcoin dropped over 50%.
In 2023–2024, as the Fed’s rate hike cycle neared its end, markets expected a weaker dollar and Bitcoin began rebounding. As DXY retreated, Bitcoin climbed from ~$16K to over $100K.
This synchronicity reflects how macro conditions deeply affect Bitcoin. DXY is a key global liquidity and risk appetite indicator, and Bitcoin investors must watch it closely.
For Bitcoin investors, DXY changes provide key trading signals:
Dollar weakness is a buy signal: Fast DXY drops often precede Bitcoin rallies.
Dollar strength calls for caution: Persistent DXY gains warrant reduced exposure or stop-losses, even if Bitcoin hasn’t yet dropped.
Watch Fed policy: DXY is heavily influenced by Fed moves—understanding monetary direction helps forecast both assets.
Beware extreme events: In panics, normal correlations may break down—avoid relying solely on historical patterns.
Real interest rates are another macro indicator closely tied to Bitcoin prices. Understanding this link is crucial for long-term analysis.
Real rates are nominal rates minus inflation, reflecting inflation-adjusted returns. The 10-year TIPS yield is commonly used as a proxy, showing the return investors accept after inflation.
When real rates are negative or low, holding cash or bonds loses purchasing power, prompting a shift to assets like gold or Bitcoin. High real rates make fixed income more attractive and dampen demand for risk assets.
Bitcoin, like gold, has a limited supply and shows strong negative correlation with real rates. When real rates rise, the opportunity cost of holding gold or Bitcoin increases, making them less attractive.
In 2020–2021, the Fed kept rates near zero and provided massive QE, keeping real rates negative (below -1%). Investors holding cash or bonds lost purchasing power, fueling Bitcoin’s rise from ~$5K to ~$69K—a gain over 1200%—driven by the negative real rate environment.
But in 2022, the Fed’s aggressive hikes pushed real rates above +1%—a swing of 200+ bps. Bitcoin plunged over 70% from its peak, bottoming near ~$16K.
In mid-2022, Bitcoin’s correlation with the 10-year TIPS yield reached -0.90 to -0.95. Each 100 bps rise in real rates typically led Bitcoin to fall 30–40%.
Bitcoin–Real Rate Correlation (2022)
| Period | Correlation | Market Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-2022 | ~ -0.95 | Real rates rose sharply, Bitcoin plunged |
| Aug 2022 | ~ -0.90 | Real rates peaked and began to fall, Bitcoin rebounded |
In July–August 2022, real rates peaked and started falling, triggering a Bitcoin rebound from ~$17.6K to ~$24K (+36%). This rally directly reflected the reversal in real rates as markets anticipated the end of the hiking cycle.
In 2024, Fed rate cuts pushed real rates lower, favoring Bitcoin and driving it from ~$40K at end-2023 to over $100K by end-2024. Lower real rates mean lower opportunity cost for non-yielding assets and reflect expectations for future inflation and growth, supporting risk assets.
Bitcoin investors should monitor real rate changes:
Falling real rates are bullish: When real rates drop or turn negative, it’s usually a good time to add Bitcoin.
Rising real rates call for caution: If real rates climb quickly, consider reducing exposure or using stop-losses—even if Bitcoin hasn’t dropped yet.
Watch inflation expectations: Real rates depend on both nominal rates and inflation outlook; monitor both.
Think long-term: Real rates mainly affect medium/long-term trends; use the indicator with a long-term view.
Market liquidity is another critical driver of Bitcoin prices. Understanding liquidity indicators helps investors anticipate price moves more accurately.
Market liquidity is the total funds available for investment. More liquidity means more capital for assets like stocks and crypto, while less liquidity puts downward pressure on prices.
The Fed’s balance sheet size, Treasury General Account (TGA) balances, and Reverse Repo Program (RRP) usage are key liquidity indicators. Their changes directly impact available investable capital.
Net liquidity = Fed assets – TGA balance – RRP balance
Fed assets inject liquidity; TGA represents funds pulled from markets by the government; RRP represents funds parked at the Fed by institutions. Net liquidity reflects actual available investment capital.
Bitcoin is highly sensitive to liquidity changes—often more than stocks. Its relatively small market cap, macro-savvy investor base, and pure risk asset nature make it especially reactive.
Fed QE and fiscal stimulus expanded the balance sheet from ~$4T to ~$9T, injecting massive liquidity. Bitcoin surged from ~$5K to ~$69K (+1280%).
Liquidity and Bitcoin Price History
| Period | Liquidity | Bitcoin Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–2021 | QE & stimulus, liquidity surge | $5K → $69K (+1280%) |
| 2022 | QT & rising TGA, liquidity drop | Down ~70% to $16K |
| Early 2023 | TGA drawdown, liquidity up | $16K → $30K (+87%) |
| 2024–early 2025 | Rate cuts & TGA drawdown, liquidity up | Broke $100K, new highs |
Fed QT and rising TGA drained liquidity, causing Bitcoin to plunge ~70%. The drop matched the liquidity contraction.
Early 2023, Treasury drew down TGA, adding liquidity and fueling a Bitcoin rebound from ~$16K to $30K (+90%).
RRP usage rises mean more funds parked at the Fed and less market liquidity. TGA rises mean government is pulling funds from the market. Both can impact Bitcoin prices.
Recent years saw major RRP drops (from ~$2.5T to hundreds of billions), releasing liquidity and fueling Bitcoin’s rebound.
Monitor:
Fed balance sheet: QE favors Bitcoin; QT is bearish.
TGA balances: Falling TGA is bullish, as government spending increases liquidity.
RRP usage: Falling RRP is bullish as funds return to markets.
Net liquidity: Track trends for medium/long-term Bitcoin forecasts.
Position early: Liquidity changes often lead price moves—adjust positions proactively.
While FOMC decisions are announced by the Chair, statements from other Fed officials also shape markets. Understanding their policy leanings and speaking styles helps gauge overall direction.
FOMC votes are collective; other members’ views matter. Public comments between meetings often provide crucial clues for policy direction. Hawkish remarks can depress risk assets; dovish comments can boost confidence.
Christopher Waller: Known for hawkishness, stressed inflation control in March 2023, cooling rate cut expectations and pushing Bitcoin from ~$31K to below $30K.
Michelle Bowman: Stressed inflation improvement insufficient in May 2024, said further hikes were possible and denied imminent rate cuts, dampening Bitcoin’s momentum.
James Bullard: As St. Louis Fed President, was a prominent hawk. In 2022, suggested a 1% hike was possible, causing short-term volatility.
Chicago Fed President Charles Evans emphasized labor market health and supported accommodative policy, but dovish voices are less influential when inflation is high.
Key points:
Distinguish voting/non-voting members: Voting members’ comments matter more.
Watch timing: Remarks around FOMC meetings are often more telling.
Assess hawkish/dovish tone: A change in stance is more significant than routine remarks.
Consistency: Multiple officials expressing similar views may signal consensus.
Don’t overreact: Single comments don’t set policy; take a broader view.
For Bitcoin investors:
Track Fed remarks calendars and prepare for key comment dates.
Monitor real-time news for short-term trading opportunities or risk avoidance.
Assess policy divergence for signs of uncertainty and caution.
Combine with other indicators for a complete market view.
Blockchain transaction data provides valuable market insights and helps investors understand participant behavior and price trends.
“HODL” has come to mean “Hold On for Dear Life,” referring to long-term holders (addresses inactive for at least 155 days).
Rising Long-Term Holder Ratio
Long-term holders now own about 75% of circulating Bitcoin (as of July 2023), a historic high and a sign of confidence and reduced available supply.
Less supply means price support if demand is steady or rising.
Rising ratios signal long-term confidence and willingness to weather volatility.
Long-term holders help stabilize prices by resisting short-term swings.
During Rate Hike Cycles
Even in the 2022–2023 downturn, long-term holder ratios kept rising, showing core investors were buying the dips.
Bitcoin moving between exchanges and personal wallets signals market sentiment. Exchange balances have fallen to multi-year lows, reflecting more self-custody, long-term intent, and reduced sell pressure.
Loose environments: Exchange outflows dominate as holders prefer long-term storage.
Tight environments: Crisis events cause temporary exchange inflows for panic selling, but the overall trend is toward reduced balances.
U.S. approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2024 brought structural change. BlackRock’s IBIT ETF, for example, had over ¥7 trillion (several billion USD) in assets by April 2025, with ongoing purchases.
Long-term orientation: Institutional ETF investors provide steady demand.
Large scale: Single purchases are much larger than retail flows.
Compliance: ETFs open Bitcoin investment to institutions previously restricted by regulation.
Major ETF Buying in April 2025
April 2025 saw net ETF inflows of ~$970 million, directly fueling Bitcoin demand and supporting prices.
Rising long-term holder ratio is bullish.
Declining exchange balances support the bull case.
ETF flows signal institutional sentiment; large inflows are positive.
Combine on-chain and macro data for a full market picture.
Focus on long-term trends, not day-to-day fluctuations.
Understanding these terms is essential for analyzing FOMC decisions and the Bitcoin market.
FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee): The Fed’s policy-setting committee, composed of seven Board members and five regional presidents, meets eight times yearly to set rates and more. Its decisions have major global impact.
Policy Rate (Federal Funds Rate): The benchmark overnight rate for banks, affecting everything from business loans to mortgages and credit cards. The Fed’s key policy tool.
Quantitative Easing (QE): Central bank asset purchases to inject liquidity and lower rates. Used when conventional rate cuts are limited.
Quantitative Tightening (QT): The reverse—shrinking the balance sheet and pulling liquidity to curb inflation or prevent bubbles. Usually bearish for assets.
Hawkish: Bias toward tightening policy (rate hikes/QT), focused on inflation control, usually bearish for risk assets.
Dovish: Bias toward easing (rate cuts/QE), focused on growth and employment, usually bullish for risk assets.
U.S. Dollar Index (DXY): Measures dollar strength against major currencies. Rising DXY means a stronger dollar; falling DXY means a weaker dollar. Bitcoin is usually negatively correlated.
Real Interest Rate: Nominal rate minus inflation. Negative real rates favor assets like gold and Bitcoin; positive real rates favor fixed income.
Risk-On/Risk-Off:
Net Liquidity: Fed assets minus TGA and RRP balances—an indicator of actual investable capital. Higher net liquidity supports asset prices.
Reverse Repo (RRP): Fed tool for institutions to park funds overnight. Rising RRP means less market liquidity; falling RRP means more.
Treasury General Account (TGA): U.S. Treasury’s account at the Fed; rising balances mean funds are pulled from the market, falling balances mean funds are injected.
Correlation Coefficient: Measures the linear relationship between two variables, from -1 to +1. Used to assess asset and macro indicator linkages.
When the Fed turns hawkish and starts QT, net liquidity falls, real rates rise, and the dollar strengthens—putting Bitcoin under pressure. When the Fed turns dovish and starts cutting rates, net liquidity rises, real rates fall, and the dollar weakens—supporting Bitcoin rallies.
Analysis of FOMC decisions and Bitcoin price trends from 2021 to 2025 yields several key conclusions for investment strategy.
1. Monetary policy drives Bitcoin prices: Fed policy changes, QE/QT, and official remarks all have major market impact.
Rate hikes are bearish for Bitcoin, raising opportunity cost and favoring fixed income. Rate cuts are bullish, lowering opportunity cost and boosting liquidity.
2. Markets react early to policy expectations: Bitcoin prices often adjust before formal policy changes, as participants read FOMC signals and official remarks.
3. Liquidity is key: Net liquidity changes explain much of Bitcoin’s price action.
4. Macro indicators are critical: DXY, real rates, and net liquidity are strongly correlated with Bitcoin. Monitor these for trend signals:
Based on the above:
1. Build a macro analysis framework: Track Fed policy, liquidity, DXY, real rates, and more.
2. Monitor FOMC meetings and official comments:
3. Align exposure with policy cycle:
4. Use on-chain data:
5. Stay flexible and humble:
Bitcoin will remain highly responsive to macroeconomic conditions. With spot ETFs and growing institutional adoption, its ties to traditional financial markets will deepen.
Bitcoin’s unique supply-and-demand dynamics—such as halving events and the “digital gold” narrative—may also drive performance beyond macro trends.
Success in Bitcoin investing requires balancing macro analysis with crypto-specific dynamics. Through ongoing research, careful analysis, and flexibility, investors can find opportunities in a market full of both potential and risk.
Remember: “Don’t fight the Fed.” Always account for monetary policy direction in your strategy, and focus on the long term for enduring success.
The FOMC sets U.S. monetary policy, shaping interest rates and liquidity. Its decisions influence investor risk appetite, directly affecting demand and volatility for Bitcoin as a risk asset.
Rate hikes usually strengthen the dollar, which tends to pressure Bitcoin lower. In the long run, however, Bitcoin’s appeal as a store of value may grow as loose policy ends, supporting future rallies.
Bitcoin often sees sharp short-term volatility after FOMC announcements, but the direction varies. Swings are driven by sentiment and leverage adjustments, with little impact on long-term trends.
Yes. Easing policy boosts liquidity and attracts investors seeking higher returns. Bitcoin’s scarcity and inflation resistance make it attractive, and historical data support this pattern.
High inflation drives demand for Bitcoin as a hedge, since its fixed supply (21 million) can’t be diluted. When fiat loses purchasing power, Bitcoin’s “digital gold” appeal rises, pushing prices higher. Rising inflation expectations typically support strong BTC performance.
Monitor market expectations for FOMC rate decisions (current odds of holding steady: 97%), and spot Bitcoin ETF flows. Policy statements around meeting dates may trigger price swings—use market uncertainty to position ahead of clear policy moves.
There is a negative correlation, but not an absolute link. Sentiment, liquidity, geopolitics, and other factors also affect Bitcoin; dollar strength is just one variable.











