

A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is an organization powered by blockchain technology that operates without a centralized administrator. In a DAO, every participant can help determine the organization's rules and operational policies, as well as contribute to its management. Compared to traditional organizations, DAOs offer much greater transparency and have garnered significant attention in recent years.
This article explains the defining characteristics and key considerations of decentralized autonomous organizations. If you’re interested in DAOs, be sure to read to the end.
A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is an entity that leverages blockchain technology to operate without a centralized administrator or hierarchical structure. One of its core features is the use of smart contracts—programs that automate contracts—to execute organizational rules and decisions.
Members hold unique tokens that grant voting rights, allowing them to shape the organization’s direction. This model prevents any individual or group from monopolizing power and ensures every participant can engage equally in the decision-making process.
DAOs are seen as having the potential to create new economic models and communities in the Web3.0 era, with numerous organizations already emerging across NFTs, DeFi (decentralized finance), and blockchain gaming. These organizations deliver a level of transparency and global, cross-border collaboration rarely achievable with traditional corporate structures.
Let’s explore three defining characteristics of DAOs. Each represents an innovative feature that sets them apart from traditional centralized organizations.
The most notable feature of a DAO is the absence of a centralized administrator. Unlike conventional organizations, all members operate on an equal footing. There are no leaders or dominant authorities; decisions are executed automatically via smart contracts on the blockchain.
Governance token holders—who possess voting rights—are empowered to shape decisions and revise rules, ensuring the organization runs in a decentralized, user-driven way. This approach prevents arbitrary decision-making or fraud by individuals or groups and enables democratic, fair governance.
Additionally, the number of governance tokens a member holds determines the weight of their voting rights, so influence is allocated according to each person's contributions or investment. This rational governance structure gives members who actively drive the organization’s growth a stronger voice.
DAOs run on blockchain technology, which provides exceptional transparency. By design, blockchain makes all transaction records and decision-making processes publicly accessible for anyone to verify.
Participants can track organizational decisions and fund flows in real time via the blockchain—a sharp contrast to traditional organizations. This transparency guards against fraud and improper fund use, while also strengthening trust among members.
Smart contract terms are also publicly visible, so every member has access to the same information about rules and policies. This eliminates information asymmetry and enables fairer, more democratic organizational management.
Because DAOs leverage blockchain, their data cannot be tampered with or falsified. Information is stored on a decentralized network, remains immutable, and is executed automatically by smart contracts—removing opportunities for human error or manipulation.
Altering blockchain data would require consensus from a majority of the network, which is virtually impossible. This ensures extremely high levels of data reliability and security.
Smart contracts execute automatically when specific conditions are met, so human intervention or subjective judgment is eliminated. As a result, DAOs offer a fair, predictable operating environment where all participants can confidently engage.
DAOs face two primary challenges. While their structure is innovative, there are significant issues that must be addressed for long-term viability.
DAOs often exist outside current legal frameworks, as existing laws and regulations are not always suited to their decentralized nature. Because participants make decisions autonomously, legal responsibilities and authority can be unclear—prompting calls for dedicated regulatory frameworks in the future.
Conventional laws assume legal entities with clear representatives, making them ill-suited for the unique structure of DAOs. Issues like contract enforcement, tax compliance, and legal liability remain largely unresolved.
In the US, Utah has passed the "Utah DAO Act," which allows DAOs to operate legally. Such pioneering efforts may serve as models for other jurisdictions, and global regulatory clarity for DAOs is expected to develop in the coming years.
DAOs are governed by smart contracts, which may contain bugs or vulnerabilities. Because smart contracts are written by humans, coding errors or design flaws cannot be completely avoided.
For example, the 2016 DAO incident saw attackers exploit a smart contract vulnerability, resulting in a loss of about 3.6 million ETH (worth approximately ¥5.2 billion at the time). This high-profile case brought DAO security risks to global attention.
Once smart contracts are deployed, updates and fixes are difficult, compounding the risk of hacks. Rigorous security audits and multi-expert code reviews are critical during development. Establishing protocols for handling discovered bugs and emergency fund protection mechanisms are also essential components of DAO risk management.
Let’s look at several major DAOs worldwide. These cases highlight both the opportunities and challenges that DAOs present.
Bitcoin is often cited as an early example of a DAO. With no central administrator, participants conduct transactions across a distributed network, making it the closest operational parallel to a DAO.
The Bitcoin network is maintained by miners worldwide, and no single person or entity can control the system. Any protocol changes require majority consensus among network participants, enabling true decentralized governance.
Since its launch in 2009, Bitcoin has operated stably without central management, demonstrating the real-world potential of DAOs.
MakerDAO is a DAO that issues the stablecoin Dai. MKR token holders participate directly in governance and decision-making. MakerDAO operates without a central administrator, with all settlements automated by smart contracts.
MakerDAO is a critical component of the DeFi ecosystem—Dai, pegged to the US dollar, is widely used across DeFi protocols. MKR holders vote on key protocol decisions, such as adjusting collateral ratios or adding new collateral assets.
This model enables MakerDAO to function as a decentralized central bank, showcasing new possibilities for financial infrastructure distinct from legacy banking systems.
The DAO, launched in 2016, was a prominent blockchain-based investment fund. Participants voted on investments through smart contracts, but a hack led to the theft of about 3.6 million ETH (worth approximately ¥5.2 billion at the time).
This high-profile hack exposed the security vulnerabilities of DAOs and the risks inherent in smart contracts. After extensive debate, the Ethereum community executed a hard fork to recover funds, which led to a split and the creation of Ethereum Classic (ETC).
The DAO incident taught critical lessons for DAO development, prompting future projects to prioritize security audits and risk management. While The DAO itself ceased operations in some areas, the insights gained continue to shape how DAOs are designed and managed today.
A DAO is an organization with no central administrator, where members use blockchain technology to vote on decisions. It’s highly transparent, and both ownership and benefits are distributed throughout the community.
DAOs have a flat, decentralized structure where members make decisions autonomously. In contrast, traditional organizations are hierarchical, with leadership concentrated at the top. DAOs allow for more flexible and efficient management.
DAOs use smart contracts for decision-making. Governance token holders vote on proposals, and results are automatically executed as code. This transparent system ensures democratic, tamper-resistant outcomes.
To join a DAO, first set up a Discord account. Open DAOs are accessible to anyone, while closed DAOs require an invitation. Check the official website or Twitter for details. Once you’re in, get involved with events and tasks to become an active member.
Key risks for DAOs include legal uncertainty, technical vulnerabilities, and slow consensus due to broad participation. Potential dangers include loss of funds from smart contract bugs, slow emergency response, and the need for participants to self-manage responsibly.
Notable successful DAOs include MakerDAO (decentralized stablecoin issuance), Uniswap (decentralized exchange), and Aave (lending protocol). These platforms handle billions of dollars in transactions and are governed in a decentralized manner.











