Is ETH hopeless? Bonnie Blockchain interview throws out a shocking opinion: even if Ethereum as a public chain is useful, it doesn't mean ETH has investment value!

robot
Abstract generation in progress

In the latest episode of the Bonnie Blockchain Interview, the host and Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik raised a highly controversial point: even if Ethereum as a public chain is very useful, it does not necessarily mean that ETH has investment value.

They used the US dollar as an analogy—USD is extremely important and useful, but almost no one considers USD as a “long-term accumulation asset.” Similarly, Ethereum as infrastructure and EVM as a development standard may be successful, but this does not automatically equate to ETH’s scarcity and return logic as an asset. In other words, “whether the network is useful” and “whether the token is worth investing in” might be two entirely different judgment systems. Ethereum and ETH perhaps should be analyzed separately.

What do you think about this issue?
Should we make a clearer distinction between “the success of public chains/crypto projects” and “the investment value of their native tokens”?

ETH-0.79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-91f31ab3vip
· 01-12 08:50
Naive and ridiculous, the US dollar is due to unlimited issuance. How many ETH are there?
View OriginalReply0
OpenClaw and Moltbook Incident Review: From AI Social Narratives to the Outlook of the Agent Economy This article provides a comprehensive review of the recent events involving OpenClaw and Moltbook, analyzing how these incidents reflect the evolving landscape of AI-driven social interactions and the emerging agent economy. We will explore the background, key developments, and potential implications for the future of AI social platforms and autonomous agents. ![OpenClaw logo](https://example.com/images/openclaw-logo.png) *OpenClaw's branding and its role in AI social networking* The rise of AI social platforms has transformed how users interact online, enabling more personalized and intelligent communication experiences. However, recent incidents have highlighted challenges related to trust, security, and the ethical use of AI agents. ### Key Events Overview - The emergence of Moltbook as a new AI social platform - OpenClaw's integration with Moltbook's ecosystem - Controversies surrounding AI-generated content and user data privacy - Regulatory responses and community reactions ### Implications for the Future As AI social platforms become more sophisticated, the development of an agent economy—where autonomous AI agents perform tasks, manage content, and facilitate interactions—will accelerate. This shift raises important questions about governance, accountability, and the economic models that will support these intelligent systems. In conclusion, understanding the dynamics of the OpenClaw and Moltbook incidents provides valuable insights into the opportunities and risks of the AI social and agent economy era. Stakeholders must collaborate to establish standards and safeguards that promote healthy growth and innovation in this rapidly evolving space.
1h ago
Gold Standard Making a Comeback? Here's a thought experiment: how can Web3 help rebuild the payment ecosystem based on "gold valuation"?
1h ago
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)