The housing in the U.S has officially entered the most unaffordable point in history. Recent statistics presented by Coin Bureau indicate that the gap has continued to expand over twenty years. Median home prices have increased by an average of 217 since 2000. Household incomes on the other hand increased at a rate of approximately 153%. That imbalance is currently driving the measures of affordability to historic levels. On the surface, the housing market still seems to be sound. Prices are still high and supply is also tight. Affordability however has failed miserably below the surface. The math no longer works to many buyers and particularly those that are first time homeowners.
The growth in home prices in the last 25 years has not only increased. They have increased much quicker than salaries. A long-term uptrend was spurred by easy credit, declining interest rates and structural housing shortages. Then followed the post-2020 boom, which took the prices into a different regime. The cost of housing has increased, even after inflation, compared to its high of the 2006 housing bubble in relation to income. However, in this instance, the drivers have changed. The primary forces have substituted speculative lending with supply constraints, zoning limits and the population demand.
Meanwhile the growth of wages was deplorable. These nominal incomes were not scaled in line with inflation of assets. Housing, medical and education expenses increased significantly at a rate that was higher than those of paychecks. This is always indicated by the Federal Reserve Economic Data and U.S census statistics. The growth of median household income is healthy on its own. However, in comparison to housing, it narrates otherwise. Due to this discrepancy, households today utilize a very high proportion of income on housing compared with previous generations. That decreases the savings, enhances debt reliance, and undermines financial security in the long-term.
Increased interest rates further increased the pressure. Buyers, who previously could afford high price now have to pay significantly increased payments monthly. The mortgage rates changed the aspects of affordability where it became difficult in most areas and almost impossible. This led to a decline in the volumes of transactions. Nevertheless, the correction of prices was not significant. Mortgage owners who had low fixed-rate mortgages opted out of selling. Supply stayed frozen. That stuck to high prices when the demand dropped.
Affordability crisis is not an economic problem anymore. It is becoming a social one. Buyers of younger age are postponing family formation. Tenants feel like they are permanently dispossessed. The geographic mobility is reducing with people remaining at their current positions to evade increased expenses. With time, this relationship can reduce the economic growth. The historical housing is an engine of wealth building. Inequality increases when there are less access points. Such tension is increasingly being reflected on the political and financial debates.
This housing imbalance is also a source of further asset-allocation discussion. . To most investors, the inaccessibility of housing reinforces the stories on the rare digital commodities. Cryptocurrency proponents tend to explain this event as an effect of the money printing and inflation of assets. Although crypto is not a substitute to housing, the comparison explains why the younger generations consider alternatives to conventional markets.
There were a number of consequences capable of alleviating the pressure. Low rate alleviation would be beneficial to monthly affordability but could possibly restart the price increase. A healthier solution would be to increase housing supply but zoning reform is sluggish. Affordability is likely to continue to be tense until they do. The information is very telling. The cost of housing did not simply become high. It became disconnected to the incomes like the U.S. has never experienced.