TVL Tally Shows RWA Momentum As Multiple Projects Clear the $1B Mark
The crypto market isn’t chasing the next meme coin right now; it’s leaning into something a bit more old-school: tokenized real-world assets. That’s the takeaway from a recent tweet by CryptoDep, which shared a snapshot from RWA.xyz showing which platforms currently hold the most value on-chain. The numbers are big enough to make even skeptical traders sit up. Several projects have crossed the billion-dollar mark, and the list reads like a who’s who of different approaches to bringing traditional finance onto blockchains.
At the top of the list sits Securitize with about $3.21 billion locked. That’s a hefty endorsement for the compliant, securities-focused model, tokenizing shares or debt in a way that lines up with regulations and familiar investor protections. Close behind is Ondo with $2.56 billion. Ondo’s strength has been packaging yield-bearing, custody-integrated products that appeal to institutions and yield-hungry retail alike. The third big name, Syrup, sits at roughly $2.30 billion and shows that there’s an appetite for different flavors of real-world exposure, not just one template.
After those three, you get into a mid-tier of projects that are still very much players: STOKR ($1.56B), Centrifuge ($1.33B), and Libeara ($1.07B). Then come firms like Superstate and Spiko, both hovering right around the $1 billion mark. Established financial houses haven’t stayed out of the room either. WisdomTree shows up with $767 million, while newer entrants such as xStocks sit at about $215 million.
What’s interesting about this list isn’t just the raw TVL figures; it’s the variety. Some platforms are tokenizing private equity or fund shares, others are focused on invoices or short-term commercial paper, and a few try to offer regulated products that institutional desks can actually use. That diversity matters because it points to a broader truth: RWAs aren’t a single product you can bolt onto a blockchain. They’re an umbrella term for a bunch of different financial engineering plays trying to solve the same problem: how to make traditionally illiquid or cumbersome assets more accessible and efficient using tokens.
TVL is an Imperfect Metric
TVL can be influenced by how assets are counted, whether collateral is off-chain, and the custodial arrangements behind the scenes, but it’s hard to argue with scale. Billion-dollar TVLs tend to indicate real capital moving, not just speculative paper. And seeing veteran asset managers alongside native crypto teams suggests that this could be more than a fad. Incumbents are exploring blockchain rails because they can cut costs and open new markets; crypto-native projects are pushing for composability and liquidity. If those two forces meet productively, you get something that looks a lot more like mainstream adoption.
That doesn’t mean everything is smooth sailing. Tokenizing real assets brings legal and regulatory complexity; clarity varies widely by jurisdiction, and regulators are paying attention. Platforms that can pair on-chain efficiency with airtight legal wrappers, transparent reporting, and secure custody will have a big advantage. For traders and portfolio managers, that’s the key question: which providers can scale while keeping the compliance and operational basics right?
For now, the takeaway is straightforward. The RWA space has moved from a niche experiment to a serious market segment. With several projects clearing the billion-dollar TVL threshold and traditional asset managers dipping their toes in, tokenized real-world assets look like they’re here to stay, but the winners will be the teams that can bridge the gap between legacy finance and the on-chain world without cutting corners. CryptoDep’s snapshot, powered by RWA.xyz data, is a useful scoreboard, and it’s worth watching how these projects evolve as regulators, institutions, and everyday investors test the model in earnest.