A literary society how to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT

Original | Odaily

Author | Aurantium aurantium

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-044a51055c-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

Yesterday, the minting of the inscription POLS on Polygon sparked a boom, and the Polygon network gas fee soared to 5,000 gwei, which is more than 100 times higher than the cost of a single inscription directly on evm.ink.

With a total of 21 million POLS sheets, the BRC-20’s Ordinals were inscribed for six months at the same number of sheets, and it takes a long time to mint even at hundreds of Polygon TPS – yesterday Polygon averaged 170 TPS, and it would take 34.3 hours to engrave all POLS.

When minting POLS, some users directly through the wallet single inscription, or using the key wizard and other ways to click in a loop, the inscription speed is relatively slow, at 23 o’clock yesterday the inscription progress reached only 60%, but by 0:00 the next day, according to Dune statistics show that the inscription progress has reached 100%. This happened because the author of the Dune query modified the query to include some POLS that were inscribed in bulk via a “smart contract”.

In fact, in the official documentation of evm.ink, there is already code for batch inscriptions, and it is very difficult to write code according to the principle of its inscriptions. **Odaily will demonstrate how to write a batch inscription contract via ChatGPT. **

Batch mint smart contracts

On the EVM, the essence of the inscription is to initiate a “transfer” and write a “specific text” in the “notes” of the transfer. In the inscription of POLS, the text reads:

data:,{“p”:“prc-20”,“op”:“mint”,“tick”:“pols”,“amt”:“100000000”}

When transferring money on the blockchain, only hexadecimal input is accepted, so the first step is to do a hexadecimal conversion through ChatGPT.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-b7f7adbdda-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

In the second step, you need to create a smart contract to initiate a transfer to your own address.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-c23fb46fc8-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

It should be noted here that ChatGPT wrote a wrong case of transferring tokens to a “contract address”, or the same case of “POLS No. 1 coin holding address transferred tokens to contract address, there is a possibility that they cannot be transferred out” in the early hours of this morning.

The third step is to modify the transfer object and make it so that it can be called multiple times in a loop.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-3f2d5ea8c7-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

At this point, a smart contract with a batch inscription has been written. Here’s a look at yesterday’s popular bulk minting contracts. The overall implementation logic is basically the same.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-dcfc7394a7-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

The first coin holder will push POLS into a black hole?

According to Dune statistics, the number one POLS token holder is “0xf362561959f51bc29f4b3abe801b5373b4e1a144”, which is a contract address, not a real caller.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-129f2e1fce-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

The result of querying the trace data through Dune is as follows, we can see that from and to are both the contract addresses, and the input is indeed the hexadecimal version of the data:,{“p”:“prc-20”,“op”:“mint”,“tick”:“pols”,“amt”:“100000000”}. In a normal inscription index, the owner of the inscription will be the contract address, not the actual caller, which means that the part of the inscription has been “hit into a black hole”.

! [How to inscribe POLS in batches through ChatGPT] (https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-7f230462a9-c5962270d0-dd1a6f-cd5cc0.webp)

However, its contract is not open source, and it is not possible to specifically explore whether there are still other ways to operate.

Summary

The community is still in contention about whether or not the POLS inscribed by the contract is valid, and due to the centralization of the inscription index, it is not yet possible to give a definitive conclusion.

On the other hand, ChatGPT has considerable room to play in the same scenario due to the simple form and process of inscriptions, not only the batch casting of POLS, but also other conventional operations of inscriptions can also be achieved through ChatGPT.