Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Should Qatar Retaliate?
The short answer: No.
What should they do instead? I believe, as the evidence suggests, that no state retains full sovereignty while it depends on another country's nuclear umbrella or hosts foreign military assets.
My instinct is that Israel may have encouraged Qatar to take a response - a "save-face" protocol (strike back a little and we won't escalate) - precisely to keep Qatar appearing as another puppet rather than an independent actor.
The smarter strategy would be a decisive pivot: revoke U.S. military contracts and replace them with Chinese partnerships.
Such a shift would undermine both U.S. and Israeli influence far more effectively than any symbolic retaliation, help localize Qatar's military manufacturing, and create a more durable balance of power in the region.
This wouldn't be merely swapping masters; it would be an investment in sovereignty, more autonomous statecraft.
@TamimBinHamad @KHK @majedalansari