
Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that records data in immutable blocks across a network of computers. This distributed database has fundamentally reshaped how different industries manage, store, and record data. The technology operates on the principle of decentralization, where information is not stored in a single location but distributed across multiple nodes in a network. There are different iterations of these networks, with the most prominent being public and private blockchains. Each type serves distinct purposes and caters to different organizational needs, from open financial systems to enterprise-level data management solutions.
Read on to learn about private blockchains, their features, how they work, and their benefits and drawbacks in the evolving digital landscape.
A private blockchain, also known as a permissioned blockchain, is a distributed ledger in which a company or organization controls who can access the database, run nodes, and participate in consensus. Unlike public blockchains that allow anyone to join and participate, private blockchains maintain strict control over network membership and access rights.
These networks are only accessible to authorized chosen parties whose identities are verified by the controlling group. They operate within an exclusive and secure environment of companies or groups that prioritize information privacy. This controlled approach makes private blockchains particularly attractive to enterprises that need to maintain confidentiality while still benefiting from blockchain's inherent advantages such as immutability, transparency among participants, and distributed data storage.
Private blockchains feature the same fundamental attributes as other blockchains, including distributed ledger technology, consensus mechanisms, immutability, and transparency. However, there are additional features that set private blockchains apart from their public counterparts, making them suitable for specific enterprise and organizational use cases.
Private blockchains are only accessible to authorized participants, creating a controlled environment where membership is carefully managed. As such, the blockchain's controlling entity decides who can join the network, can restrict access to data, and knows the identities of all the participants. This identity verification process ensures that every network member is accountable and traceable. Moreover, the controlling entity can also override or delete records when necessary, providing flexibility in data management that is not typically available in public blockchains. This level of control allows organizations to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies while still leveraging blockchain technology.
Private blockchains are very selective regarding participants, implementing rigorous vetting processes before granting network access. The data and information related to participants have limited visibility, and confidentiality is paramount in these closed systems. Notably, onboarding participants based on invitation reduces the risk of malicious actors gaining access to the network and enhances the participants' trust in the system. The controlled environment means that security threats common to public blockchains, such as anonymous attacks or spam transactions, are significantly minimized. Additionally, the known identity of all participants creates a layer of accountability that further strengthens the network's security posture.
Private blockchains use consensus mechanisms that fit the participants' needs and the specific requirements of the controlling organization. The controlling organization sets customized rules on operation, governance, and decision-making, tailoring the consensus process to optimize for speed, security, or other priorities. A private blockchain consensus follows a structured process with pre-selected validators, often chosen by the controlling group based on trust, technical capability, or business relationships. This approach allows for faster transaction processing compared to public blockchains, as the consensus does not need to account for potentially adversarial or unknown participants.
A group or organization runs these permissioned blockchains, maintaining control over the network's operations and governance. A protocol is in place to guarantee the integrity of data and validate the transactions added to the network. The process of adding data to the network has many moving parts that work together to ensure security, efficiency, and reliability.
Nodes are devices that run the network software and can create, validate, and store blockchain data. These nodes form the backbone of the blockchain network, processing transactions and maintaining copies of the ledger. The network software is either licensed by a software company or built by the controlling entity, depending on the organization's technical capabilities and specific requirements.
The private blockchain is made up of a network of nodes distributed across different locations or departments. The controlling organization or group runs this network, maintaining oversight of all operations. The organization running the private blockchain can delegate validator nodes to participants to allow them to validate transactions before they are recorded on the ledger. Other participants can get nodes, but they cannot validate transactions, serving instead as read-only access points to the blockchain data. Notably, the nodes hosted by the controlling entity have a record of the entire ledger, providing complete visibility into all network activities. Meanwhile, participant nodes only hold parts of the ledger they can access, ensuring that sensitive information remains compartmentalized according to access rights.
Most private blockchains have a software application that connects participants to the network and allows them to make transactions. This application serves as the user interface, abstracting the complex blockchain operations into simple, business-friendly actions.
Consensus mechanisms in blockchain allow the network to verify transactions and reach an agreement on the state of the ledger, ensuring that all participants have a consistent view of the data. Every private blockchain has a consensus mechanism that meets the participants' needs and the controlling entity's requirements, balancing factors such as speed, security, and decentralization.
In a private blockchain, the authority of the controlling organization is not enough to ensure trust and integrity. A consensus mechanism is necessary to legitimize the data added to the ledger and provide cryptographic proof that transactions have been properly validated. This mechanism serves as a check on the controlling organization's power and ensures that the blockchain maintains its integrity.
Consensus mechanisms enhance private blockchains' privacy and security by restricting who can approve transactions and add data to the blockchain. The organization running the blockchain pre-selects validators to participate in the consensus, ensuring sensitive participant data is protected during validation. This pre-selection process means that validators are known, trusted entities rather than anonymous participants.
Using pre-selected validators who are known to the organization ensures accountability and creates a clear chain of responsibility. The transactions are grouped in blocks, validated by pre-selected nodes that find the hash function, and added to the blockchain in a sequential, immutable manner. This process maintains the cryptographic integrity of the blockchain while operating within a controlled environment.
Examples of private blockchain consensus mechanisms include proof-of-authority, where validators are explicitly authorized by the controlling organization; Federated Byzantine Agreement, which allows a group of trusted nodes to reach consensus; proof-of-importance, which prioritizes validators based on their network contribution; and proof-of-elapsed-time, which uses a lottery system among trusted validators to determine who adds the next block.
Private blockchains limit participants to those verified and authorized by the controlling organization, creating a trusted network environment. Because every participant is approved by the running organization, they have a higher degree of data privacy than other blockchain networks. As a consequence, the chances of malicious actors infiltrating the network are significantly reduced, as each participant has undergone identity verification and vetting processes.
The controlling organization also restricts what data participants can access, implementing granular permission systems. Enforcing access rights on a ledger carrying sensitive information ensures that user privacy is upheld and only trusted participants can view the data they are authorized to see. This approach allows organizations to use blockchain technology while maintaining compliance with data protection regulations and internal security policies. Additionally, private blockchains can implement encryption at various levels, further protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access even within the network.
Private blockchains are customizable distributed ledgers that prioritize privacy and security while offering several operational advantages that make them attractive to enterprises and organizations.
Private blockchains offer selective access rights to the network, allowing organizations to maintain fine-grained control over who can see what information. Not all participants can view the full ledger, ensuring that sensitive business information remains compartmentalized. The controlling organization has the authority to limit the data participants can access and protect user data from the public, maintaining confidentiality while still leveraging blockchain's benefits. It verifies all the participants' identities, which increases the level of trust in the network and creates accountability. This level of control is particularly important for industries dealing with sensitive information, such as healthcare, finance, or supply chain management, where regulatory compliance and confidentiality are paramount.
Private blockchains have fewer participants and are more efficient than public blockchains, allowing them to process transactions more quickly. Their controlled nature and limited nodes facilitate higher throughput and faster transactions, as the consensus process does not need to account for thousands or millions of unknown participants. Fewer nodes ensure that private blockchains can reach consensus fast and implement necessary changes, improving scalability without sacrificing security. This efficiency makes private blockchains suitable for enterprise applications that require high transaction volumes and low latency. Additionally, the controlled environment allows organizations to scale their blockchain infrastructure according to their specific needs, adding or removing nodes as business requirements change.
Private blockchains have lower transaction fees as they have limited participants and high throughput, making them economically attractive for business applications. Permissioned blockchains don't increase transaction fees based on demand, unlike public blockchains where fees can spike during periods of high network usage. Instead, they maintain a low and predictable price point, allowing organizations to forecast costs accurately. The network is also more cost-effective to operate; it can be run with fewer resources and can use existing infrastructure, reducing the capital expenditure required for implementation. This cost efficiency, combined with the ability to leverage existing IT infrastructure, makes private blockchains an attractive option for organizations looking to adopt blockchain technology without significant upfront investment.
Private blockchains have the potential to iron out inefficiencies in many traditional industries by providing secure, transparent, and efficient data management solutions. A shared ledger can streamline information processing and communication between stakeholders, reducing delays and errors associated with traditional data management systems. The blockchain's controlled nature ensures that participants are verified and receive restricted access to data, maintaining security while enabling collaboration.
Private blockchains' unique features offer a transformative approach to recording and managing data for business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer enterprises. These features address common pain points in enterprise data management, such as data silos, lack of transparency, and inefficient reconciliation processes.
Permissioned blockchains are intrinsically private, making them ideal for enterprise use cases where confidentiality is essential. Only authorized participants can access the ledger, ensuring that competitive or sensitive business information does not leak to unauthorized parties. The closed system ensures that sensitive business information is kept secure and participants are vetted before gaining access to the network. Private networks can be customized to the business's needs and can be tailored to fit the enterprises' requirements and goals, whether that involves specific compliance requirements, integration with existing systems, or particular performance characteristics. Enterprises can operate private blockchain using existing infrastructure, which minimizes disruption during adoption and allows for gradual implementation without requiring a complete overhaul of existing systems.
Private blockchains can revolutionize supply chain management by providing security, accountability, and transparency of data during the movement of goods from production to consumer. Supply chains involve multiple parties, including manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and logistics providers, all of whom need access to accurate, timely information.
Permissioned blockchains can streamline the logistics process and offer data validation and transparency through a shared ledger with records of all transactions. This offers a single source of truth for all stakeholders in the network, increasing trust among participants and reducing disputes over data accuracy. By recording each step of the supply chain on the blockchain, organizations can track products from origin to destination, verify authenticity, ensure compliance with regulations, and quickly identify and resolve issues such as delays or quality problems. The immutability of blockchain records also helps prevent fraud and counterfeiting, as any attempt to alter historical data would be immediately apparent to all network participants.
Private blockchain networks are reshaping the banking industry's technology infrastructure by reducing reliance on third parties and lowering transaction costs. Traditional financial systems often involve multiple intermediaries, each adding cost and complexity to transactions. Blockchain technology can streamline cross-border transactions and automate complex commands through smart contracts, reducing the time and cost associated with international payments. The sector is experiencing significant growth, and the number of B2B cross-border transactions finalized on blockchain is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years. Research estimates indicate that in the near future, B2B cross-border transactions on blockchain will reach hundreds of millions and make up a significant percentage of total B2B international payments.
The shared ledger can create accountability and promote transparency between all parties involved in financial agreements, reducing the risk of fraud and errors. Private blockchains allow financial institutions to maintain the confidentiality required by regulations while still benefiting from blockchain's efficiency and security. Applications include interbank settlements, trade finance, securities trading, and regulatory reporting, all of which can be made more efficient through blockchain technology.
The healthcare industry deals with sensitive medical data and a large number of patient records that need to be stored securely and recorded accurately. Traditional healthcare data systems often suffer from fragmentation, with patient information scattered across multiple providers and systems. Private blockchains' privacy and security features can be customized to store immutable records and give authorized parties selective access to patient information, addressing these challenges.
The distributed ledger can facilitate more collaborative patient care by providing medical practitioners with updated medical records that are chronologically organized and easily accessible. This ensures that doctors, specialists, and other healthcare providers have access to complete, accurate patient histories when making treatment decisions. Private blockchains can also help with medical research by allowing secure, anonymized sharing of patient data while maintaining compliance with privacy regulations. Additionally, blockchain can improve pharmaceutical supply chain management, ensuring the authenticity of medications and preventing counterfeit drugs from entering the supply chain.
The healthcare blockchain market is experiencing rapid expansion, with the market size expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34.02% over the coming decade, reflecting the significant potential of this technology in healthcare applications.
Industry experts recognize the distinct value proposition of private blockchains for specific use cases. As noted by Patrick Lowry, CEO of Samara Asset Group and host of the Proof of Words podcast:
"Open, public, and permissionless are ideals that certain cryptocurrencies were built on. These are the features you would want for an open, transparent monetary system that anyone in the world can participate in. At the same time, private blockchains have a lot of use cases.
For example, for ERP software in manufacturing, it doesn't make sense to use a public blockchain where anyone can see the movement of goods. In that instance, a private and permissioned blockchain makes more sense.
The same goes for healthcare data. No one wants their healthcare data on a publicly viewable blockchain, even if it was anonymized. This is another area where a private, permissioned blockchain would make sense that allows you to use your private keys to access and share your medical data with specific parties you approve."
This perspective highlights the importance of matching blockchain type to use case, recognizing that private blockchains serve essential functions in scenarios where privacy and controlled access are paramount.
While private blockchains offer numerous advantages, they also come with some drawbacks and limitations that organizations must consider when evaluating whether this technology is appropriate for their needs.
Private blockchains are centralized networks that are under the control of an organization or group, which contradicts the decentralization principle that is fundamental to blockchain philosophy. The full ledger is only accessible to the controlling organization, and in some cases, the central body can alter or delete data on the blockchain. Blockchain centralization can create concerns about data integrity and trust, as participants must rely on the controlling organization to maintain honest and accurate records. This centralization also creates a single point of failure; if the controlling organization experiences technical issues, security breaches, or acts maliciously, the entire network can be compromised. Critics argue that centralized blockchains lose some of the key benefits that make blockchain technology revolutionary, essentially becoming sophisticated databases with some blockchain characteristics rather than true decentralized systems.
Integrating private blockchains into existing industries is not a clear-cut process since the technology faces regulatory ambiguity and a lack of standardization. Blockchain technology has no clear regulatory frameworks in many jurisdictions, and no standardized protocol exists across different blockchain implementations. Most projects use standalone consensus mechanisms and programming languages for their network, which reduces blockchain interoperability and makes it difficult for different blockchain systems to communicate with each other. This lack of standardization creates challenges when organizations want to connect their private blockchain with other systems or blockchains.
Private blockchains can also be incompatible with legacy systems that organizations have relied on for years or decades. Integrating blockchain technology with existing databases, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and other business applications often requires significant technical work and custom development. Organizations must also train staff to work with blockchain technology and may need to redesign business processes to take full advantage of blockchain capabilities. These integration challenges can increase implementation costs and timelines, potentially offsetting some of the efficiency gains that blockchain promises.
Participants in a private blockchain have limited access to data on the network, which can reduce transparency compared to public blockchains. The controlling organization selects who can add information to the blockchain and restricts participants from viewing the full ledger, creating information asymmetries within the network. While this limited transparency is often intentional and necessary for privacy reasons, it can also reduce trust among participants who cannot independently verify all network activities. Participants must trust the controlling organization to maintain accurate records and act honestly, which reintroduces some of the trust requirements that blockchain technology aims to eliminate. This limitation means that private blockchains may not be suitable for applications where full transparency and auditability by all participants are essential requirements.
The biggest differences between these two network types are related to decentralization, privacy, accessibility, and efficiency. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations deciding which type of blockchain best suits their needs.
Public blockchains are decentralized with no central authority, and nodes are responsible for maintaining the network through distributed consensus. Meanwhile, private blockchains are partially decentralized, with a central authority managing the network and controlling access. Public blockchains are at risk for a 51% attack, where a malicious actor controlling the majority of network computing power can manipulate the blockchain, while private network centralization eliminates that risk by controlling who can participate in consensus.
Private blockchains focus on maintaining participant privacy and protecting data from unauthorized actors, implementing access controls and identity verification. In contrast, public blockchains are fully transparent, and the information on the ledger is open to everyone, allowing anyone to view all transactions and verify the blockchain's state. Public blockchains are accessible to anyone with an internet connection, while private blockchains are only accessible to verified and authorized participants who have been granted permission by the controlling organization.
Permissioned blockchains have limited participants, which increases transaction throughput and speed, as consensus can be reached quickly among a small number of known validators. In contrast, public blockchains have millions of participants, which slows down consensus and transaction speed but provides greater decentralization and security through distributed validation. Transaction costs also differ significantly; public blockchains often have variable fees based on network demand, while private blockchains typically maintain low, predictable transaction costs.
Private blockchain networks have the potential to reshape industries and revolutionize how companies manage and record data in the coming years. The ledger's features of transparency among authorized participants, security, and privacy can fix flaws across finance, supply chain management, healthcare, and numerous other sectors. The technology is flexible and still evolving, leaving room to eventually overcome its current challenges and limitations through continued innovation and development.
Leveraging permissioned blockchain technology can give enterprises a competitive edge by gaining the trust of stakeholders and increasing company revenue through improved efficiency, reduced costs, and enhanced data security. As the technology matures and more organizations implement private blockchain solutions, best practices will emerge, standards will develop, and integration challenges will diminish. The future of private blockchains looks promising, particularly for applications where privacy, control, and efficiency are paramount concerns. Organizations that successfully implement private blockchain solutions today may find themselves well-positioned to capitalize on the technology's benefits as it becomes more mainstream in the business world.
Private blockchains are controlled by a single entity with restricted access. Public blockchains are open and transparent, allowing anyone to participate. The key difference lies in control and accessibility permissions.
Private blockchains offer restricted access control, enhanced data security, and immutability. Key advantages include improved privacy protection, faster transaction processing, and suitability for enterprise use cases requiring high trust and compliance.
Private blockchains are widely used in supply chain management for tracking and traceability, financial services for secure transactions, enterprise data management for controlled access, and internal process optimization. They enhance transparency while protecting sensitive information.
Private blockchains ensure security and data privacy by restricting network access to verified participants only. The network owner controls who can join and participate, reducing attack risks. Owners can modify records as needed, effectively protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access.
Enterprises select private blockchains for superior security, regulatory compliance, and data confidentiality. Private blockchains offer controlled access, faster transactions, and better privacy protection compared to transparent public blockchains.
Private blockchains typically offer superior performance and scalability compared to public ones. They achieve higher transaction throughput by optimizing consensus mechanisms, reducing node quantities, and customizing network configurations. This enables faster transaction processing and improved efficiency for enterprise applications.











