On February 13, it was reported that during a Senate hearing, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul Atkins publicly outlined his latest stance on cryptocurrency regulation for the first time. He stated that establishing a federal-level regulatory framework for the crypto asset market in the United States is “long overdue.” This statement is seen as a significant policy signal, indicating that the U.S. is shifting from an “enforcement-first” approach to a phase of “rule-based” system development.
For years, U.S. regulation of the crypto industry has primarily relied on case-by-case enforcement, lacking unified standards, with unclear compliance pathways for companies, and frequent obstacles to capital and innovation. Atkins pointed out that this fragmented approach can no longer accommodate the current market scale, and regulators need to coordinate under a common framework rather than acting independently.
He also confirmed that the SEC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are engaging in deep collaboration to lay the groundwork for future legislation. Since early 2026, he has been leading an inter-agency initiative called “Project Crypto,” aimed at clarifying the boundaries of digital asset classification and aligning regulatory policies with bills currently under discussion in Congress. The Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act is regarded as a key reference document; if ultimately passed, it will redefine the regulatory authority over security-type and commodity-type digital assets.
This shift has not been without resistance. Senator Elizabeth Warren publicly questioned during the hearing whether regulatory enforcement might be weakened and mentioned the potential influence of political donations on policy direction. This reflects ongoing domestic disagreements in the U.S. regarding the role of digital assets.
Nevertheless, the more significant change lies in the attitude itself. Regulatory agencies are no longer questioning whether cryptocurrencies should exist but are beginning to discuss how to incorporate them into the formal financial system. For the market, this helps reduce policy uncertainty; for institutional investors, it can lower compliance risks; and for developers, it provides clearer boundaries for innovation.
While comprehensive legislation still requires time, this statement indicates that the U.S. is moving toward a unified and predictable crypto regulatory era, which could profoundly impact the global digital asset market landscape.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
The Israeli military is hunting for spies on Polymarket
Israeli Defense Forces reservists and civilians have been charged for placing bets on military secrets on Polymarket,涉嫌 insider trading. This incident highlights the risks of unfair competition and insider involvement in prediction markets, especially in sensitive areas like war. It calls for potential future regulation to prevent similar issues.
区块客14m ago
Regulatory Storm Brewing? The US SEC and CFTC Keep a Close Watch on the Prediction Market
The prediction markets in the United States have rapidly emerged in recent years, attracting the attention of regulatory agencies. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins emphasized that the legal status of prediction markets as "gambling" or "financial instruments" remains controversial, especially for contracts involving events such as elections. The overlapping regulatory authority requires collaboration between federal and state governments, and whether clear rules will be established in the future remains to be seen.
区块客1h ago
The Israeli military is hunting for spies on Polymarket
An Israeli civilian and a reserve member of the Israel Defense Forces are accused of profiting from insider information by betting on the prediction market Polymarket, posing serious security risks. This incident has once again raised concerns about insider threats and information asymmetry providing competitive advantages, which could have serious consequences for war and political domains.
PANews4h ago
Paul Atkins Just Said What We've All Been Waiting For Crypto Regs FINALLY Coming!
At a Senate hearing, SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that federal regulation of cryptocurrency is overdue, signaling a shift from enforcement to clarity. The SEC and CFTC plan to collaborate on standardized regulations via Project Crypto, aiming to support new legislation. Despite criticism from Elizabeth Warren regarding potential regulatory relaxation, the overall message indicates a recognition that cryptocurrency is integral to financial law, reducing uncertainty for institutions and developers.
Coinfomania4h ago
Netherlands to impose 36% tax on unrealized gains starting in 2028, crypto and stock investors face cash flow challenges
February 13 News, the Dutch House of Representatives passed the "Third Pillar Actual Yield Act" (Wet werkelijk rendement box 3) this week, planning to reshape the country's investment tax system starting January 2028. The new system will tax the "actual yield" of most investment assets such as stocks, cryptocurrencies, bonds, and others, at an approximate rate of 36%. This means that even if investors have not sold their assets, they are still required to pay annual taxes on unrealized gains.
Under the current framework, taxes are largely based on assumed rates of return, whereas the new legislation will directly tax actual returns. This change is seen as a significant shift in the Dutch tax system. For highly volatile cryptocurrencies, the mechanism of taxing unrealized gains could lead to noticeable liquidity pressures. Some community members warn that if the market experiences a correction, investors may face the risk of their paper profits being rapidly eroded after paying taxes.
GateNewsBot5h ago
Multiple banks in Taiwan have had their cryptocurrency custody applications rejected! Warning accounts become obstacles
Several Taiwanese financial institutions, including private banks and pure online banks, have completed negotiations with partnered VASPs over the past year to submit applications to the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) for a trial virtual asset custody business. However, they have been repeatedly rejected. The FSC's reason is that "the number of warning accounts is too high," and they require banks to significantly reduce the number of warning accounts before their applications can have a chance of success.
MarketWhisper5h ago
