Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor told billionaire Ray Dalio to own bitcoin after the billionaire warned the post-World War II global order is breaking down, positioning the cryptocurrency as a shield against mounting geopolitical and financial instability.
Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor shared on social media platform X on Feb. 16 a response to billionaire investor Ray Dalio’s assertion that the post-1945 world order has unraveled, highlighting bitcoin as an asset without counterparty exposure amid rising geopolitical strain.
Replying to Dalio directly, Saylor wrote:
“If you believe the world order is breaking down, own the asset with no counterparty. Bitcoin.”
His remark followed an extensive post by Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, who argued that global leaders now broadly acknowledge the collapse of the framework established after World War II. Citing discussions at the Munich Security Conference, Dalio pointed to statements from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio describing a shift toward great power politics and a new geopolitical era.
Dalio framed current tensions as part of what he calls the “Big Cycle” of external order and disorder, a historical pattern in which periods of cooperation and prosperity give way to rivalry and conflict. He outlined five forms of modern conflict—trade, technology, capital, geopolitical, and military—contending that economic and financial tools such as tariffs, sanctions, asset freezes, and restricted capital access often precede armed confrontation.
Drawing comparisons to the 1930s, Dalio detailed how debt crises, wealth gaps, populism, and protectionist policies intensified global instability before World War II. He emphasized that international relations ultimately operate on power dynamics rather than enforceable law, and warned that when rising and declining powers approach parity, the risk of miscalculation grows.
Against that backdrop, Saylor’s bitcoin-focused response underscored a view held by digital asset advocates that decentralized money can function as a hedge during periods of currency debasement, sovereign debt expansion, and capital controls.
Dalio argues that rising geopolitical tensions, trade conflicts, capital restrictions, and great power competition signal a late-stage “Big Cycle” similar to the 1930s, increasing systemic risk for global markets and investors.
Saylor highlights bitcoin’s lack of counterparty risk, fixed supply, and decentralized structure as protective features for investors seeking insulation from currency debasement, sovereign debt crises, and geopolitical shocks.
No counterparty risk means bitcoin does not depend on governments, banks, or corporations to retain value, making it attractive during periods of financial repression, sanctions, or institutional instability.
A shift toward protectionism, tariffs, and military or economic conflict could pressure equities, bonds, and fiat currencies, prompting investors to diversify into alternative assets like bitcoin as a potential macro hedge.
Related Articles
Consensys Founder: Still optimistic about the long-term development of the crypto industry; ETH has a stronger functional demand compared to BTC