UK plans to restrict cryptocurrency political donations: tightening regulation and foreign interference risks become the main focus
On February 26, news reports indicate that some UK Members of Parliament are pushing for a temporary ban on political cryptocurrency donations to address potential foreign funding interference risks. Led by Matt Western, Chair of the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, the MPs have written to Housing, Communities and Local Government Secretary Steve Reed, recommending a pause on party acceptance of digital asset donations until clear regulatory guidelines are established by the Electoral Commission.
In the letter, Matt Western pointed out that the UK currently lacks a unified national enforcement framework to comprehensively regulate sources of political funding, especially given the high anonymity of crypto assets, which presents new challenges for transparency in political financing. As the UK’s role in European security increases, political funding could become a significant factor influencing diplomatic positions, making strengthened oversight mechanisms strategically important.
The proposal includes allowing parties to handle crypto donations only through virtual asset service providers registered with the Financial Conduct Authority, and requiring high-confidence verification of the ultimate source of funds. MPs also suggest banning tools like mixers that could obscure the origin of funds, and mandating that parties convert cryptocurrencies into GBP within 48 hours to reduce price volatility and compliance risks.
Additionally, the proposal involves enhancing due diligence on donors, increasing penalties for violations involving foreign funds, and expanding regulatory agencies’ enforcement powers in election finance audits. Although some MPs previously sought to include a comprehensive ban directly in the Representation of the People Act, the version submitted to Parliament in February does not contain such provisions, indicating that policy discussions are still ongoing.
Notably, political fundraising via cryptocurrencies has already seen significant growth in other countries. For example, U.S. election regulators permit political committees to accept crypto donations, provided they comply with disclosure and contribution limits. Several politicians, including Donald Trump, have adopted digital asset fundraising during election cycles. In contrast, the UK currently emphasizes compliance with political funding laws, anti-money laundering checks, and cross-border fund monitoring. This regulatory trend could have lasting impacts on future policies regarding crypto political donations and the development of global crypto compliance frameworks.
Related Articles
What signals did the US SEC send behind the new 2% discount regulation for stablecoins?
Tether and Circle ramp up their presence in the South Korean market, possibly in response to local stablecoin regulations
South Africa Announces Major Bitcoin Regulation Plan for 2026
Polymarket predicts Taiwan's 2026 county and city elections with an "Kuomintang win rate of 88%"! Beware of trading violations of the Election and Recall Law
Kalshi Bans MrBeast Staff Member in Insider Trading Investigation
UK Tightens Cryptocurrency Investment Channels: ISA Accounts Ban Crypto ETNs, Tax-Free Investment Pathways Cut Off