In May 2024, WeatherXM went public. This DePIN project, claiming to be the “world’s largest community-driven weather network,” was backed by Lightspeed Faction’s $7.7 million Series A funding, and supported by a lineup of top institutions: Protocol Labs, Borderless Capital, Arca, Placeholder VC, and Consensys Mesh. In its launch month, the token WXM soared to a historic high of $2.36, gaining widespread attention.
The story at the time was very compelling: users buy weather station hardware, collect local weather data, and earn tokens after verification. In less than two years, the project claimed to have deployed over 5,000 weather stations across more than 80 countries, with data even adopted by Athens International Airport. Hardware spread worldwide, data purchased by institutions, and tokens circulated on both Arbitrum and Solana—this was almost the perfect narrative for the DePIN track.
But behind the story, there is another set of numbers.
As of January 2026, WXM’s price is $0.039, down 98.4% from its all-time high. Early investors who bought at the $1.5 issuance price face a 97.4% loss. Over the past year, the token’s price has declined across all timeframes: 22% over 7 days, 20% over 30 days, and 92% over 365 days. This isn’t just a normal correction; the asset’s value has nearly been wiped out.
Even more alarming is the holder data. WXM has only 292 addresses holding tokens, with less than $20,000 in 24-hour trading volume, and liquidity is nearly exhausted. A project claiming to be “globally community-driven” has fewer active secondary market participants than a local internet cafe.
The biggest hidden risk lies in the tokenomics. WXM has a total supply of 100 million tokens, with only 5 million in circulation—just 5%. This means 95 million tokens are yet to be unlocked, creating significant future sell pressure. On-chain data shows that the top three addresses hold 82.16% of the tokens, with the largest address alone holding 39.15%. Such concentration is far from the ideal of decentralization.
The project team once claimed on social media that they had deployed over 7,800 weather stations. However, in the Series A announcement and multiple authoritative sources, this number was revised to “over 5,000.” As of January 2026, the actual active stations may be even fewer.
This isn’t exaggeration; it’s a common phenomenon in the DePIN space—“digital inflation.” Deploying hardware globally requires supply chains, logistics, and localized operations, each step burning through cash. Distributing 5,000 devices across over 80 countries means an average of just over 60 stations per country. Can such density support the narrative of a “global weather network”? That’s questionable.
Data quality also faces challenges. Industry insiders point out that when DePIN projects attempt to scale with cheap hardware, data quality often declines. Without unique, high-quality data, a truly valuable network cannot be built. WeatherXM’s adoption by Athens Airport is a highlight, but a single institutional purchase cannot sustain the entire network’s commercial value.
In May 2024, WXM was listed on exchanges, reaching a peak of $2.36. Since then, it has been on a steady decline with little meaningful rebound.
The reasons are straightforward. First, the narrative cooled down. In 2024, DePIN was still one of the hottest tracks, but by 2025, the market started to lose faith in the “physical device + token incentives” model. According to Delphi Digital, tokens related to DePIN and AI dropped over 80% on average in 2025, ranking fifth from the bottom among all sectors.
Second, liquidity dried up. With a 24-hour trading volume under $20,000, any sell order could push the price to new lows. Only 292 addresses hold tokens, meaning market depth is nearly zero; large holders wanting to exit can’t find counterparties.
Third, unlocking pressure looms. With only 5% circulating supply, 95 million tokens held by project teams, investors, and founders remain locked. No matter how low the price is now, future unlocks will continue to put downward pressure on the market, deterring buyers.
In January 2026, WeatherXM posted an intriguing update on LinkedIn titled “Entering 2026 with Focus, Drive, and Direction.” The post stated: “WeatherXM is no longer a crypto experiment; it is real-world infrastructure.”
The team announced that the company would shift from “Go-to-Market” to “Go-to-Value,” focusing on building revenue streams based on weather intelligence. Demand comes from agriculture, energy, insurance, logistics—industries that need accuracy and reliability, not crypto narratives. Insurance is the first vertical to be validated, with the project supporting global parametric insurance products based on real-time weather observations and on-chain proofs.
Meanwhile, the team is developing an “agentic web”—autonomous systems capable of obtaining trustworthy inputs from the physical world. Through x402-compatible solutions, DAOs can directly sell datasets to research institutions and AI models, creating sustainable revenue streams.
In plain language, this means the project team realizes that relying solely on token sales to incentivize data contribution isn’t sustainable. They are shifting toward earning real revenue from enterprise clients. In this new narrative, WXM tokens are being quietly marginalized—they are no longer the core of incentives but serve as governance and data purchase “permission tools.”
WeatherXM’s experience is not unique in the DePIN space.
Some commentators on social platforms have noted: “Funding lists are shiny, but the community is dead—this disconnect is too common in DePIN. Fake prosperity.” Another user said: “Funding lists look dazzling, but the community is lifeless—this pattern is all too familiar.”
Early 2026, a heated debate erupted in the crypto VC circle about DePIN. Crucible Capital founding partner Meltem Demirors publicly stated on X: “DePIN is dying; I don’t see it coming back.” She argued that the token models “deny the physical principles of finance”—when markets demand efficiency, ideologically driven decentralized models become burdensome.
Nascent partner Dan Elitzer was even more direct: his team completely avoided this track, believing DePIN is “almost entirely fake decentralized garbage ICOs,” resulting in “less efficient infrastructure deployment.”
Where does the problem lie? The core issue is the conflict between capital costs and hardware costs. Industry insiders point out that when projects try to scale with cheaper devices, data quality tends to decline; if devices are too expensive, higher token rewards are needed to cover costs, creating an intractable cycle.
WeatherXM’s weather stations cost between $400 and $900, depending on model and accessories. Users buy, deploy, and connect the hardware, contributing data to earn WXM rewards.
At the current token price of $0.039, the payback period becomes a harsh math problem. Assuming a station can earn $20 worth of WXM per month (a very optimistic estimate), it would take 20 to 45 months to break even. During this period, the token price might continue to fall, unlock pressures persist, hardware could break down, and data might be abandoned.
More critically, the value of token rewards depends on secondary market demand. With only 292 holder addresses and less than $20,000 in daily trading volume, this assumption is fundamentally flawed.
Conclusion
In early 2026, the WeatherXM team posted on LinkedIn: “For DAOs and tokens, market perception depends on execution. We will make execution transparent and readable. By the end of 2026, we will provide deeper transparency on governance and value flows.”
This statement can be interpreted in two ways:
One optimistic: the team recognizes the issues and is shifting toward a real business model with promising prospects.
Another pessimistic: the project openly admits that over the past two years, they have been “building tracks” and “validating demand,” but the value of tokens and DAOs has never truly aligned. The promise to provide transparency only by the end of 2026 means that WXM holders will have to wait at least 10 more months.
From raising $7.7 million to a 92% drop in token price, from 5,000 stations to only 292 holder addresses, WeatherXM’s story is a typical example of a DePIN narrative collapse. It has real hardware, real funding, and real institutional backing, but these are insufficient to sustain token value.
When the bubble bursts, the question remains: if a project relies on selling tokens to incentivize data contribution, but the token itself has no liquidity or demand, what can sustain it?
WeatherXM’s answer is to shift toward B2B revenue, de-emphasize tokens, and build “real-world infrastructure.” Whether this approach is correct will only be clear by the end of 2026. But for ordinary users who bought at the peak in 2024 or paid $900 for a weather station in 2025, it’s already too late.
At least they now know one thing: projects with shiny funding lists may have communities that are truly as cold as a grave.
Related Articles
User wallet information exposed! On-chain detective ZachXBT reveals Axiom employee suspected of insider trading
MICA Daily|ETH short positions have been liquidated, is the next wave coming for the bulls?
Did Axiom insider trading get investigated by Pumpfun's ZachXBT?
ZachXBT exposes Axiom insider trading, employees orchestrated a $200,000 illegal profit scandal
Base Ecosystem Flow Protocol completes exclusive agent auction, raising over $100,000 in 9 minutes
The total amount of Gate platform token GT staked has exceeded 4,000 tokens.