According to on-chain analysis, some large ETH holders are cutting their losses. Among them, the whale nemorino.eth has liquidated 7107.08 WETH, incurring a loss of over 3.769 million USD. Meanwhile, another whale has deposited 3500 ETH, with a total value of 8.42 million USD.

Odaily Planet Daily reports that on-chain analyst Ai Yi monitored that the "ETH holdings were rebalanced to WBTC after 4 years," with a giant whale exchanging $9.06 million worth of WETH for WBTC. In the past 20 minutes, he sold 3,437.09 ETH at an average price of $2,637.62 and bought 109.61 WBTC for $82,494.79; previously, his first rebalancing earned him a 6.45% ETH holding, and the second rebalancing earned him 9.26 WBTC (approximately $810,000).

It is reported that on-chain analysts have detected a whale holding for 4 years frequently exchanging WETH and WBTC, involving over $50 million, attempting to profit from exchange rate fluctuations. The most recent rebalancing earned approximately $810,000.

According to on-chain analysts' monitoring, a whale swapped ETH held for 4 years into WBTC at the beginning of the year, and recently swapped WBTC back into ETH, increasing their ETH holdings by 6.45%. The total value of their holdings is currently $67.38 million.

BlockBeats News, January 22 — According to on-chain analyst Ai Aunt (@ai_9684xtpa), the swing whale nemorino.eth sold 3,000 WETH at $3,095 last night, and just five minutes ago bought them all back at $2,991.29, creating a T to lower the average price; currently, he holds a total of 7,104.13 WETH with an average cost of $3,045.24, still showing an unrealized loss of $390,000.

Swing trader nemorino.eth bought 9,043 WETH at an average price of $3,085 from November 24, 2024, to January 20, 2025. He previously had an unrealized profit of $2.87 million but did not take profit. Recently, he sold 3,000 WETH for a profit of only $30,000. He currently still holds 4,089.83 WETH, with an unrealized loss of approximately $472,000.

ChainCatcher message, according to Arkham data, at 06:02, 4000 ETH (worth approximately $12.47 million) was transferred from Veda to the Wrapped Ether (WETH) contract address.

WLFI Strategic Reserve's $15.07 million worth of WBTC extracted from Aave has been fully converted into WETH. During the liquidation process, a loss of $1.978 million was incurred, resulting in 4611.65 WETH with an average cost of $3260.88.

Gate News Bot Message, January 6th, according to CoinMarketCap data, as of press time, CLO (Yei Finance) is currently priced at $0.42, up 49.60% in the past 24 hours, with a high of $0.48 and a low of $0.27. The 24-hour trading volume reached $25.2 million. The current market capitalization is approximately $53.9 million, an increase of $17.9 million from yesterday. Yei Finance is a multi-chain DeFi platform offering cross-chain lending, trading, and asset bridging services. The platform's core products include the YeiLend lending protocol, YeiSwap exchange, and Pre-Deposit Vaults cross-chain storage. Users can perform one-click cross-chain deposits on multiple blockchains such as Sei, Arbitrum, Ethereum, and HyperEVM, while earning real yields and Clovis points rewards. YeiLend provides lending markets for various assets including USDC, SEI, WETH, WBTC, and more; YeiSwap features zero-slippage trading and high-yield liquidity mining as its main highlights. The platform has received support from multiple ecosystem partners including API3 and LayerZero, and has been audited by security agencies such as BlockSec, Hypernative, and PeckShield.

BlockBeats News, December 30 – The IPFi platform within the Story ecosystem, Unleash Protocol, announced that its smart contract experienced unauthorized activity, resulting in the withdrawal and transfer of user funds. Preliminary investigations indicate that an external address gained management permissions through Unleash’s multi-signature governance mechanism and executed an unauthorized contract upgrade, triggering unapproved asset withdrawals. Currently affected assets include WIP, USDC, WETH, stIP, and vIP. These assets were subsequently transferred to external addresses via third-party cross-chain infrastructure. Unleash stated that the incident originated from its own governance and permission framework, and there is no evidence to suggest that the Story Protocol’s contracts, validators, or underlying infrastructure were affected; the impact appears to be limited to Unleash.