In the crypto world, “tokenized stocks” is a highly misleading concept. Many users’ first reaction is: If I buy a token on-chain, does that mean I hold Apple or Tesla stock? The answer, in almost every real scenario, is no. To understand why, we need to go back to a basic question: What is a stock, fundamentally?
In traditional finance, a share of stock is not just “a tradable price.” It contains at least four layers of rights:
Here’s the key question: When a stock is “tokenized,” are all these rights truly transferred on-chain?
Currently, most so-called tokenized stocks on the market are not on-chain representations of stock rights. They’re closer to one of these three forms:
In other words, what users usually get isn’t “stock,” but a financial certificate highly correlated with the stock’s price.
Two fundamentally different things: In traditional finance, they’re often tied together; but in crypto, they can be completely separated.
Stock itself means:
Stock price means:
Tokenized stocks almost always choose the latter. That’s why users see:
But price movements look “almost identical.”
Before getting into complex financial engineering, you can understand the current market with these two structures.

This is currently the most common and most misunderstood type.
Key takeaway: This type of token is more like a “synthetic asset version of a stock,” not a “digital version of a stock.”
This structure usually describes itself as: “Each token is backed by 1 real share.”
It sounds great, but users must ask three questions:
In most real cases:
Essentially: Users are trusting the custodian’s creditworthiness, compliance, and legal structure—not the blockchain.
This is the core—and most overlooked—issue with tokenized stocks. There’s only one reason: Securities are always a legal issue, not a technical one. In almost all major jurisdictions:
If a token:
Then legally: It’s not a stock.
Even if:
None of this automatically converts into shareholder rights.
Tokenized stocks ≠ Complete RWA. Many people habitually classify tokenized stocks as RWA (Real World Assets), but this is a misnomer. More accurately: It’s tokenization of real-world asset prices, not complete on-chain transfer of real-world asset rights.
At this stage: Tokenized stocks are more like an interface between TradFi price systems and crypto liquidity—not an actual migration of TradFi property rights.
Despite these structural limitations, tokenized stocks keep coming back into focus for simple reasons.
What both sides are really trading isn’t equity itself, but “familiarity + liquidity.”