Law Professors Prefer AI-Generated Answers Over Peer Responses in Recent Study, 75% Preference Rate

According to a recent study led by Stanford University, law professors preferred answers generated by artificial intelligence over those written by fellow professors in contract law reasoning tasks. In 2,918 blinded comparisons, Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro won 75.92% of its matchups against human instructors, while Google's NotebookLM won 74.75% of the time. The study involved 16 professors from 14 U.S. law schools, including Stanford, Yale, NYU, and the University of Chicago. AI-generated answers were also flagged as harmful less often than professor-written responses, with Gemini recording a 3.41% harmfulness rate compared with 12.06% for human instructors.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments